[1]黄乙玲,姚喜双.普通话水平测试的真实性研究[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,(02):134-139.
　HUANG Yiling,YAO Xishuang.A Study on the Authenticity of Putonghua Proficiency Test[J].,2021,(02):134-139.
点击复制

普通话水平测试的真实性研究()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2021年02期
页码:
134-139
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study on the Authenticity of Putonghua Proficiency Test
文章编号:
1000-579(2021)02-0134-06
作者:
黄乙玲1; 2;  姚喜双2
1.江西师范大学 国际教育学院,江西 南昌 330022; 2.中国社会科学院 研究生院,北京 102488
Author(s):
HUANG Yiling1; 2;  YAO Xishuang2
1.School of International Studies,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330022; 2.Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China
关键词:
语言测试;  普通话;  真实性
Keywords:
language testing;  Putonghua;  authenticity
分类号:
H102
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
真实性是现代语言测试研究中的核心问题之一。真实性保证了测试结果能够有效地表征应试者在目标语域中的语言运用能力,是衡量测试质量的重要依据。目前,学界对真实性的概念界定及其在测试各环节中的应用实践尚有争议。开展普通话水平测试中的真实性研究有助于提升测试对汉语普通话学习的反拨效用,为未来新兴技术在测试领域的开发、利用及测试向不同界域发展提供了参考依据。首先,通过探索学界三种主流测试真实观在汉语普通话测试领域的适用性,对普通话测试真实性进行了概念界定,提出真实性与信度、效度等因素共同构成评价普通话测试质量的依据; 其次,从普通话水平测试活动的基本要素出发,分析测试各环节的真实性因素,探索如何提升普通话水平测试的真实性程度以提高测试质量; 最后,探讨了真实性研究在汉语普通话测试中的发展前景。
Abstract:
Authenticity is one of the core issues in modern language testing research.Authenticity ensures that the test results can effectively represent the examinee’s language performance in the target domain,which is an important basis for measuring the test quality.At present,the definition of authenticity and its application in testing are still controversial in academic circles.The research on the authenticity of Putonghua proficiency test is helpful to improve the backwash effect of the test on the learning of Putonghua,and provide a reference for the development and utilization of new technologies in the field of testing and the development of testing in different fields in the future.Firstly,this paper explores the applicability of three mainstream testing concepts in the field of Putonghua testing,defines the concept of authenticity of Putonghua testing,and proposes that authenticity,reliability,validity and other factors constitute the basis for evaluating the quality of Putonghua testing; Secondly,starting from the basic elements of the Putonghua proficiency test,this paper analyzes the authenticity factors of each link of the test,and explores how to improve the authenticity of the Putonghua proficiency test to improve the quality of the test,Finally,this paper discusses the development prospect of authenticity research in Chinese Putonghua testing.

参考文献/References:

[1]Morrow,K.Evaluating Communicative Tests[M]//In Anivan,S.,Editor.Current Developments in Language Testing.Singapore:SEAMEO Regional Language Centre,1991.
[2]Wood.,R.Assessment and Testing[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1993.
[3]Bachman,L.F.& Palmer,A.S.Language Assessment in Practice:Developing Language Assessments and Justifying Their Use in the Real World[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2010.
[4]韩宝成.语言测试:理论、实践与发展[J].外语教学与研究,2000(1):47-52.
[5]徐启龙.L.F.Bachman关于语言测试真实性的研究与发展综述[J].外语测试与教学,2012(3):53-59.
[6]Hoekje,B.“Language”“Communication” and the Longing for the Authentic in LSP Testing[J].Language Testing,2016(2):289-299.
[7]Clark,J.L.D.Theoretical and Technical Considerations in Oral Proficiency Testing[M]//In Randall,L.J.,Spolsky,B.Testing Language Proficiency.Virginia:Centre for Applied Linguistics,1975.
[8]朱丽红,韩世梅.远程计算机辅助普通话水平测试的改进策略研究[J].中国远程教育,2013(11):74-79.
[9]齐军华.计算机辅助普通话测试与人工测试对比分析[J].语言文字应用,2020(1):69-75.
[10]姚喜双.《语言文字规划纲要》与国民语言能力提高[J].语言科学,2016(4):337-338.
[11]刘楚群.当今语言规范观:中和诚雅[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(6):68-75.
[12]韩玉华.普通话水平测试发展历程[M].北京:语文出版社,2014.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-10-22
作者简介:黄乙玲(1979-),女,江西上饶人,江西师范大学副教授,中国社会科学院研究生院博士研究生。研究方向为语言测试。
姚喜双,男,黑龙江双城人,国家语委咨询委员会委员,中国社会科学院研究生院教授、博士生导师。研究方向为语言测试、媒体语言。
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-04-20