[1]姚云.罗尔斯对康德道德原则的建构主义诠释[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,(02):63-67.
 YAO Yun.Rolles' Constructivist Interpretation on Kant's Moral Principles[J].,2013,(02):63-67.
点击复制

罗尔斯对康德道德原则的建构主义诠释()
分享到:

《江西师范大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2013年02期
页码:
63-67
栏目:
出版日期:
2013-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Rolles' Constructivist Interpretation on Kant's Moral Principles
作者:
姚云;
中国人民大学 哲学院,北京,100872
Author(s):
YAO Yun
关键词:
建构主义绝对命令自律理性反思的平衡原初状态
Keywords:
constructivism absolute command self-discipline rationality balance of reflection original position
分类号:
B82-09
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
罗尔斯的建构论试图从一个新的视角去解读康德道德原则中的自律。他把绝对命令的自然法公式作为绝对命令程序,建构出康德的道德原则,使它更加接近人们的生活实践。建构的过程是反思的平衡,它被运用到罗尔斯的正义理论中,正义两原则的形成就是建构主义方法的运用。原初状态使正义原则逻辑上无矛盾,反思的平衡又确保了它的意愿上的无矛盾。原初契约的前提条件——无知之幕保证了正义原则理性选择的自律性,是对康德的自律原则的补充。
Abstract:
Rolles' constructivist interpretation tries to explain the self-discipline of Kant's Moral Principles from a new perspective.He takes the natural law formula of absolute command as the absolute command program,and constructs Kant's Moral Principles,making it closer to the practice of people's lives.The construction process is a reflection of the balance,and it is used in Rolles' justice theory,and the formation of the two principles of justice is the application of constructivist approach.The original position makes principles of justice logically consistent.The reflection of the balance ensures the consistence of the willingness.The prerequisite of the original contract-the veil of ignorance guarantees the self-discipline of rational choice of principles of justice,and is a supplement for Kant's self-discipline principles.

参考文献/References:

[1]胡真圣.两种正义观:马克思、罗尔斯正义思想比论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2004.
[2]Korsgaard.Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth Century Moral Philosophy[C].in APA Centennial Supplement to The Journal of Philosophical Research,2003.
[3]〔美〕克里斯蒂娜·科尔斯戈德.规范性的来源[M].杨顺利译.上海:上海译文出版社,2010.
[4]李秋零.康德著作全集:第4卷[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[5]John Rawls.Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy[M].Harvard University Press,2000.
[6]〔德〕康德·道德形而上学原理[M].苗力田译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005.
[7]〔美〕约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.

相似文献/References:

[1]李萍.社会管理的伦理审视初探[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,(02):26.
 LI Ping.A Study of Social Administration from the Perspective of Ethics[J].,2012,(02):26.
[2]郭丽芳,沈丁立.国际争端解决机制的历史考察[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,(03):104.
 GUO Lifang,SHEn DingLi.A HistOrical InvestigatiOn On InternatiOnal Dispute Settlement Mechanism[J].,2015,(02):104.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01