[1]廖俪琪.曹植甄后恋情的心理学阐释及与五言诗形成之关系——以木斋相关研究为基础[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,(02):88-94.
　LIAO Liqi.Relationship between Interpretation of Psychology about the Romance of TSAU Chih and JEN Mi and Formation of Pentasyllabic Poems——Based on MU Jai's Correlational Research[J].,2013,(02):88-94.
点击复制

曹植甄后恋情的心理学阐释及与五言诗形成之关系——以木斋相关研究为基础()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2013年02期
页码:
88-94
栏目:
出版日期:
2013-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Relationship between Interpretation of Psychology about the Romance of TSAU Chih and JEN Mi and Formation of Pentasyllabic Poems——Based on MU Jai's Correlational Research
作者:
廖俪琪;
台湾国立中山大学 中文系,台湾 高雄 80424
Author(s):
LIAO Liqi
关键词:
曹植; 甄后; 木斋; 古诗十九首; 心理学; 道德伦理
Keywords:
TSAU Chih;  JEN Mi;  MU Jai;  nineteen ancient poems;  psychology;  ethics
分类号:
I207.22
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
曹植与甄后的恋情被诸多学者视为无稽之谈,但依木斋对曹植、甄后与"古诗十九首"的研究后发现,曹植的早熟性格与甄后贤淑聪慧的本性易使两人相互吸引,其证据即藏在现存的"古诗十九首"和曹植文集中。从南宋到清代儒家学者乃至当今学者对这一恋情关系的质疑,皆未能从历史文献出发,而是从伦理道德角度关注,最终使后代文人将植甄的爱情变成了"好事者捏造为之"的故事,从而遮蔽了十九首的历史真相,客观上为这一研究引申到心理学、道德学等更为深广的领域提出了要求。
Abstract:
The romance of Tsau-Chih and Jen-Mi is regarded by many scholars as nonsense.But according to Mu-Jai's study on Tsau-Chih,Chen-Mi and the Nineteen Ancient Poems,the precocious character of Tsau-Chih and virtuous and intelligent nature of Chen-Mi is easy to make the two attract each other.This evidence hidden in the extant Nineteen Ancient Poems and Tsau-Chih's anthology are found.The Confucian scholars from the Southern Song Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty,even today's scholars,questioned their relationship.But their query is based not on the relevant historical documents.It is a banner of ethics,and their affairs ultimately become a tale of “busybody's fabrication” by the literati of later generations.The historical truth hidden in the Nineteen Ancient Poems is closed over.And the study was extended to the more profound fields of psychology,ethics and science.

参考文献/References:

[1]张 法.略谈木斋对当下中国文学史研究的推动[J].江西师范大学学报(哲社版),2009,(5).
[2]萧 统.文选[M].台北县:汉京文化事业有限公司,1983.
[3]朱绪曾.曹植集考异[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1995.
[4]刘克庄.后村诗话[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1995.
[5]王 力.中国语言学史[M].台北:五南出版社,1996年.
[6]木 斋.论建安二十二年为曹植的人生转折——兼析曹植《美女篇》《蝉赋》《节游赋》的写作背景[J].河北师范大学学报,2012,(3).
[7]木 斋.采遗芙蓉:曹植诗文中的爱情意象——兼论建安十六年对曹植的意义[J].山西大学学报,2011,(5).
[8]赵幼文.曹植集校注[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1984.
[9]木 斋.古诗十九首与建安诗歌研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[10]罗立干.新译文心雕龙[M].李振兴校阅.台北:三民书局,2008.
[11]钟 嵘.诗品[M].台南:北一出版社,1974.
[12]陈 寿.三国志[M].台北:史学,1974.
[13]陈秉璋.道德社会学[M].蔡明哲主编.台北:桂冠图书出版社,1988.
[14]黄世琤,黄富顺.发展心理学[M].台北县:空中大学出版社,2009.
[15]Richard Gerrig,Philip Zimbardo.心理学[M].游恒山编译.台北:五南出版社,2007.
[16]司马彪.续汉书[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983.
[17]李 昉.太平广记[M].〔清〕黄晓峰校刻.台北:新兴出版社,1973.
[18]徐震堮.世说新语校笺[M].台北:文史哲出版社,1985.
[19]刘维崇.曹植评传[M].台北:黎明文化事业,1977.
[20]郭 利.影响历史的古代姊弟恋[J].文苑,2012,(7).
[21]何 焯.义门读书记[M].北京:中华书局,1987.
[22]丁 晏.曹子建集[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1978.
[23]林启彦.中国学术思想史[M].台北:书林出版社,1994.

相似文献/References:

[1]董宏钰.《昭明文选》所收曹植五言诗与《古诗十九首》韵律对比——对木斋先生关于《古诗十九首》作者问题的音韵学考证[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,(05):91.
　DONG Hongyu.Rbytbmic Contrast Between tbe Five-cbaracter Poems by CAO Zbi in Z0ao M0ng Wen Xuan and Gu 000 000 J0u 00ou——Researching Muzhai's"Author Problems"About Gu Shi Shi Jiu Shou From the Perspective of Phonology[J].,2015,(02):91.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01