[1]周良慧,冯娇.论诉讼和解的性质和效力[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,(06):55-60.
 ZHOULianghui,FENGJiao.On the Nature and Efficiency of Settlement of Action[J].,2014,(06):55-60.
点击复制

论诉讼和解的性质和效力()
分享到:

《江西师范大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2014年06期
页码:
55-60
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Nature and Efficiency of Settlement of Action
作者:
周良慧;冯娇;
北京航空航天大学 法学院,北京,100191;北京航空航天大学 经济管理学院,北京,100191
Author(s):
ZHOULianghui;FENGJiao
关键词:
诉讼和解和解协议本质问题外部因素
Keywords:
settlement of actionsettlement agreementinherent problemsexternal factors
分类号:
D925
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
对诉讼和解性质定位,理论上可用"私法行为说"为基点来加以说明,当事人可在和解协议中约定具有诉讼效力,由于和解协议的达成发生在诉讼过程中,和解协议是经过法院审查确认的,此时便具有了诉讼效力正当性基础。和解协议具有诉讼效力,也保证了诉讼和解的强制性和权威性。遵循对诉讼和解的实质化、要件化、具体化这一发展路径,并对今后可能的发展方向进行讨论,从诉讼和解制度的具体建构中明确其在司法实务中的功能和价值。
Abstract:
Based on the theory of“private law behavior”,we can define and explain the nature of settlement of action. And each of the parties can reach an agreement to maKe the settlement valid. For the settlement agreement is reached in the process of litigation,and examined and affirmed by the court,it has litigation efficiency. Because of the legal effectiveness of the agreement,the mandatory and authority of reconciliation in an action can be ensured. We should abide by the essence,require-ments,and specific of reconciliation in an action,discuss the possible development direction for the future,and clarify its function and value in the judicial practice from the construction of lawsuit re-conciliation system.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘阅春.和解与调解:翻度置换的法学思考[J].司法改革评论,2002,(1).
[2]吴泽勇.论诉讼和解[J].法学研究,1998,(2).
[3]张晋红,易 萍.论民事和解制度的完善[J].法律科学,1995,(5).
[4]李 曼.调解语境下的民事诉讼和解[J].南京理工大学学报,2011,(12).
[5]杨 路.诉讼中和解制度研究[J].法学适用,1998,(12).
[6]张永泉.执行前和解协议法律效力研究[J].法学家,2011,(1).
[7]王利明.论和解协议[J].政治与法律,2014,(1).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
教育部人文社科重点研究基地中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院2012年基地项目(项目批准号:10912259); 中国政法大学2012年度横向科研项目(项目编号:2021—23212099)
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01