[1]曾晓青,陈美荣,黄仁辉,等.专家与新手在成本-收益结构条件推理上的差异比较[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,(02):108-120.
 ZENG Xiaoqing,CHEN Meirong,HUANG Renhui,et al.A Difference Comparison Between Experts and Novices in Conditional Reasoning of the Cost-profit Structure[J].,2015,(02):108-120.
点击复制

专家与新手在成本-收益结构条件推理上的差异比较()
分享到:

《江西师范大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2015年02期
页码:
108-120
栏目:
出版日期:
2015-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Difference Comparison Between Experts and Novices in Conditional Reasoning of the Cost-profit Structure
作者:
曾晓青;陈美荣;黄仁辉;胡竹菁;
江西师范大学 心理学院,江西省心理与认知重点实验室,江西 南昌 330022;南昌师范学院 教育系,江西 南昌,330029;宜春学院 心理教育中心,江西 宜春,336600
Author(s):
ZENG Xiaoqing;CHEN Meirong;HUANG Renhui;HU Zhujing
关键词:
专家-新手成本-收益社会契约理论条件推理
Keywords:
experts-novicescost-benefitsocial contract theoryconditional reasoning
分类号:
B840
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为考查专家和新手两类被试在条件推理上的差异,以及社会契约理论与"知识与试题双重结构模型"的差异,本研究以四卡任务为研究范式,采用自编的包含有成本-收益结构的社会契约和非社会契约条件推理问题为研究材料,结果发现:(1)在成本-收益结构的社会契约问题上,若以形式逻辑作为统计标准,专家成绩则显著地好于新手;若按社会契约作答标准进行统计,则专家与新手间差异不显著;(2)就非社会契约问题而言,专家的作业成绩显著地好于新手的作业成绩;(3)内容熟悉的比不熟悉的社会契约问题更有助于提高被试的作业成绩。(4)总体上,标准社会契约问题成绩显著好于转换社会契约问题成绩;"知识与试题双重结构模型"没有得到验证,在一...
Abstract:
In order to explore the differences between expert and novice in the conditional reasoning, and the differences between social contract theory and dual-structure model of knowledge and item, four cards task are taken as the research paradigm,and the research materials include social contract and non-contract social conditional reasoning problems of cost-benefit structure. The results show:(1)in the social contract problems of cost- profit structure,according to formal logic standards,the expert score is significantly better than that of novices;in terms of the social contract theory,there are not significant differences between experts and novices;(2)on non-social contract issues,experts’ performances are significantly better than those of the novice;( 3 )compared with unfamiliar social contract,participants of familiar social contract are better;(4)on the whole,standard social contract problem scores are significantly better than converting social contract scores;“the dual -structure model of knowledge and item”has not been proven,to a certain extent,this model conforms to the formal logic as the criterion of the answer.

参考文献/References:

[1]Wason,P.In New Horizons in Psychology[M].London:Penguin,Harmondsworth,U.K.,1966.
[2]Wason,P.& Johnson-Laird,P.Psychology of Reasoning:Structure and Content[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard Univ.Prees,1972.
[3]Wason,P.In Thinking and Reasoning:Psychological Approaches[M].London:Routledge & Kegan Paul,1983.
[4]胡竹菁,朱丽萍.人类推理的心理学研究[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007.
[5]Evans,J.St.B.T.Logic and Human Reasoning:An Assessment of the Deduction Paradigm[J].Psychological Bulletin,2002,(128).
[6]Cosmides,L.Deduction or Darwinian Algorithms:An Explanation of the “Elusive” Content Effect on the Wason Selection Task[D].Cambridge:Doctoral Dissertation,Harvard University,University Microfilms,1985.
[7]Cosmides,L.Ph.D.Dissertation[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard Univ.Press,1985.
[8]Cosmides,L.The Logic of Social Exchange:Has Natural Selection Shaped How Humans Reason?Studies With the Wason Selection Task[J].Cognition,1989,(31).
[9]Cosmides,L.,& Tooby,J.Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture,Part II.Case Study:A Computational Theory of Social Exchange[J].Ethology and Sociobiology,1989,(10).
[10]曾晓青,张凤华,胡竹菁.不同指导语对成本—收益结构条件推理的影响[J].心理学探新,2012,(4).
[11]贾海燕,刘 茨.执行四卡任务的一般认知过程探析[J].考试周刊,2012,(16).
[12]胡竹菁.“心理模型”和“知识与试题双重结构模型”的比较研究[J].心理科学,1999,(4).
[13]胡竹菁.推理心理学研究中的逻辑加工与非逻辑加工评析[J].心理科学,2002,(25).
[14]梁宁建.专家和新手问题解决认知活动特征的研究[J].心理科学,1997,(5).
[15]Cosmides,L.& Tooby,J.In The Adapted Mind:Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture[M].New York:Oxford Unir.Press,1992.
[16]徐宝朋.社会交换情景和概率因素对条件推理的影响[D].郑州:河南大学硕士学位论文,2008.
[17]张 勇,熊哲宏.语用图式和欺骗情境对四卡片任务的促进作用[J].心理科学,2009,(5).
[18]胡竹菁,朱丽萍.推理结论正确性判定标准再探[J].心理与行为研究,2003,(4).
[19]Gigerenzer,G.& Hug,K.Domain-Specific Reasoning:Social Contracts,Cheating,and Perspective Change[J].Cognition,1992,(43).
[20]Overton,W.F.,Newman,J.L.Cognitive Development:A Competence-activation/utilization Approach[A].In T.M.Field,A.Huston,H.C.Quay,L.Troll & G.E.Finley(Eds.).Review of Human Development[C].New York:Wiley,1982.
[21]Overton,W.F,Newman,J.L.Scientific Methodologies and the Competence-moderator-performance Issue[A].In E.Nei-mark,R.D.Lisi,& J.Newman(Eds.).Moderators of Competence[C].Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum,1985.
[22]Overton,W.F.,Newman,J.L.Competence and Procedures:Constraints on the Development of Logical Reasoning[A].In W.F.Overton(Ed.).Reasoning,Necessity and Logic:Developmental Perspectives(PP.1-34)[C].Hillsdale NJ:Erlbaum,1990.
[23]李 丹,张福娟,金 瑜.儿童演绎推理特点再探——假言推理[A].心理科学通讯,1985,(1).
[24]Markovits,H.,Vachon,R.Conditional Reasoning,Representation,and Level of Abstraction[J].Developmental Psychology,1990,(6).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目“推理心理学几种主要理论模型的实验比较研究”(编号:31460252); 江西省社会科学规划项目“成本—收益结构条件推理的认知研究”(编号:12JY08); 江西师范大学博士启动基金
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01