[1]强 舸.治理实践与民主巩固:基于1990年代韩国、菲律宾案例的比较研究[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,(03):11-18.
 QIANG Ge.Practice of Governance and Consolidation of Democracy:A Comparative Study Based on the Cases of South Korea and Philippines in 1990s[J].,2016,(03):11-18.
点击复制

治理实践与民主巩固:基于1990年代韩国、菲律宾案例的比较研究()
分享到:

《江西师范大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2016年03期
页码:
11-18
栏目:
出版日期:
2016-06-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Practice of Governance and Consolidation of Democracy:A Comparative Study Based on the Cases of South Korea and Philippines in 1990s
作者:
强 舸
中共中央党校 党建部,北京 100091
Author(s):
QIANG Ge
Department of Party Building,Party School of the Central Committee of CPC,Beijing 100091,China
关键词:
治理实践 民主巩固 韩国 菲律宾
Keywords:
practice of governance democratic consolidation Korea Philippines
分类号:
D73/77
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
民主巩固研究存在经济条件、政治制度、社会文化、历史遗产等多种框架,这些框架都强调民主转型时刻的初始条件对后来漫长民主巩固历程的影响。而基于韩国和菲律宾1990年代民主巩固与反腐败治理历程的比较研究却发现,民主巩固是长期的历史过程,它不仅依赖于转型时刻的初始条件,更取决于民主体制确立之后的动态历史进程中的一系列政治事件和治理实践。
Abstract:
There are several research frameworks in the field of the consolidation of democracy,such as economic conditions,political systems,soceity and culture,historical heritage,etc.In a word,these frameworks emphasize the influence of the initial conditions in democracy transition time on the course of democratic consolidation later.However,this paper holds different views.Based on the comparative study of the democratic consolidation course in Korean and Philippines,as well as the anti-corruption course in the 1990s,this paper argues that the consolidation of democracy is a long historical process,which does not only depend on the initial conditions of the transition time,but also(or we should say “more”)depends on a series of political events and governance practices in the dynamic historical process after the democratic institutions are established.

参考文献/References:

[1]〔美〕霍华德·威亚尔达.民主与民主化比较研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
[2]Larry Diamond.The Globalization of Democracy:Trends,Types,Causes and Prospect[A].Robert Slater.Global Transformation and The Third World[C].Colo.:Lynne Rienner,1992.
[3]〔美〕戴蒙德.第三波过去了吗?[A].刘军宁.民主与民主化[C].北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[4]Schmitter P.Transitology:the Science or the Art of Democratization?[A].Joseph S.Tulchin.The Consolidation of Democracy in Latin America[M].London:Lynne Ri-enner Publisher,1995.
[5]〔美〕胡安·林茨,阿尔弗莱德·斯泰潘.民主转型与巩固的问题:南欧、南美和后共产主义欧洲[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2008.
[6]Lipset S.M.Some Social Requisites of Democracy:Economic Development and Political Legitimacy[J].American Political Science Review,1959,(1).
[7]Przeworski A.,Limongi.Modernization,Theories and Facts[J].World Politics,1997,(2).
[8]〔美〕亨廷顿.第三波——20世纪后期的民主化浪潮[M].刘军宁译.北京:三联书店,1998.
[9]〔美〕罗伯特·达尔.论民主[M].李柏光,林猛译.北京:商务印书馆,1999; Pettit.P.Republicanism:A Theory of Freedom and Government[M].Oxford:Clarendon,1997.
[10]Linz J.The Perils of Presidentialism[J].Journal of Democracy,1990,(1).
[11]Horowitz D.Comparing Democratic Systems[A].Larry Diamond et.The Global Resurgence of Democracy[C].The Johns Hopkins University Press,1996.
[12]Gasiorowsk M,Timothy Power.The Structural Determinants of Democratic Consolidation:Evidence From the Third World[J].Comparative Political Studies,1998,(6).
[13]Lipset M.The First New Nation:the United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective[M].Norton Press,1979.
[14]Powell B.Contemporary Democracies,Participation,Stability,and Violence[M].Harvard University Press,1982.
[15]〔美〕阿伦·利普哈特.民主的模式:36个国家的政府形式和政府绩效[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006.
[16]Diskin A,Diskin H,Hazan R.Why Democracies Collapse:the Reasons for Democratic Failure and Success[J].International Political Science Review,2005,(26).
[17]〔美〕阿尔蒙德,等.公民文化——五个国家的政治态度和民主制[M].上海:东方出版社,2008.
[18]〔美〕帕特南.使民主运转起来[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2002.
[19]Lipset M.The centrality of Political Cultures[J].Journal of Democracy,1990,(4).
[20]〔美〕胡安·林茨,阿尔弗莱德·斯泰潘.民主转型与巩固的问题:南欧、南美和后共产主义欧洲[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2008.
[21]Jackman R,Ross A.Miller.A Renaissance of Political Culture?[J].American Journal of Political Science,1996,(3).
[22]Fishman R.Democratic Practice After the Revolution:the Case of Portugal and Beyond[J].Politics Society,2011,(2).
[23]Sangmpan S.N.Politics Rules:the False Primacy of Institutions in Developing Countries[J].Political Studies,2007,(1).
[24]Rostein B.Creating Political Legitimacy,Electoral Democracy Versus Quality of Government[J].American Behavioral Science,2009,(3).
[25]朱幸福.风云诡谲的菲岛政坛[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2002.
[26]郭定平.韩国政治转型研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000.
[27]赵自勇.菲律宾非暴力群众运动的根源和后果[J].当代亚太,2006,(8).
[28]Thomas D.Lancaster,Gabriella R.Montinola.Toward a Methodology for the Comparative Study of Political Corruption[J].Crime,Law,& Social Change,1997,(1).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2015-12-20基金项目:2014年中央党校学科建设专项基金一般项目“改善党对社会的领导与推进国家治理能力现代化”作者简介:强 舸(1985-),男,陕西宝鸡人,政治学博士,中共中央党校党建部讲师。研究方向为政党理论与实践。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01