[1]曹 虹.陶渊明与洙泗遗音——兼及海东文家对陶渊明的儒学想象[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,(04):102-109.
 CAO Hong.TAO Yuanming and Confucian Bequeathed Teachings——Concurrently on the Korean Literati’s Confucian Imagination of TAO Yuanming[J].,2016,(04):102-109.
点击复制

陶渊明与洙泗遗音——兼及海东文家对陶渊明的儒学想象()
分享到:

《江西师范大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2016年04期
页码:
102-109
栏目:
出版日期:
2016-08-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
TAO Yuanming and Confucian Bequeathed Teachings——Concurrently on the Korean Literati’s Confucian Imagination of TAO Yuanming
作者:
曹 虹
南京大学 文学院,江苏 南京 210023
Author(s):
CAO Hong
School of Liberal Arts,Nanjing University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210023,China
关键词:
陶渊明 儒家 理学 韩国辞赋
Keywords:
TAO Yuanming Confucian School Neo-Confucianism Korean Odes
分类号:
I206.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
从陶渊明与儒学的关系,颇可以领略陶公的诗性所达到的思想深度。陶渊明的诗文中几乎篇篇有孔门的影子,或遥相映射,或旁见侧出,以至于清儒沈德潜认为他当得起“圣门弟子”。“先师遗训”是陶渊明生命意识之所取资与融会,不仅如此,从洙泗遗音作为一个生生不已的活的传统而言,陶渊明对儒学的灵动体认也成为照察后世理学风景的一个窗口,在李朝中期的赋家手上所发生的“理学化”与“陶渊明化”的迭合现象就是一个有趣的印证。
Abstract:
From the relationship between TAO Yuanming and Confucianism,we can comprehend better how profound his ideological level is.Almost every piece of his works reflects the influences of Cofucian school.Some of his poetry map the shadow of the school,and there are allusions woven subtly in his poetic texts.No wonder that the Confucian scholar SHEN Deqian thought that TAO Yuanming could be regarded as “a Confucian disciple”.TAO Yuanming had taken “the bequeathed teachings of Confucius” as an inexhaustible resource from which he learned and formed his life consciousness.More than this,as a vividly living and inheriting tradition,Confucian teachings endowed TAO Yuanming quite inspiring realizations,which could be considered as a window to glimpse some segments of Neo-Confucianism scenery.During the midlle of Ly Dynasty the popularization of Neo-Confucianism coincided with that of TAO Yuanming.This phenomenon interestingly verified this.

参考文献/References:

[1]王气中.艺概笺注[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1986.
[2]萧 统.陶渊明集序[A].逯钦立校注.陶渊明集[M].北京:中华书局,1979.
[3]逯钦立.关于陶渊明[A].逯钦立校注.陶渊明集[M].北京:中华书局,1979.
[4]逯钦立.陶渊明集[M].北京:中华书局,1979.
[5](日)兴膳宏.六朝文学论稿[M].彭恩华译.长沙:岳麓书社,1986.
[6]程 颢,程 颐.二程集[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
[7]熊 节.性理群书句解·通书序[M].熊刚大注.文渊阁《四库全书》(第709册)[Z].台北:台湾商务印书馆景印.
[8]陈荣捷.近思录详注集评[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2007.
[9]朱 熹.四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[10]陈寅恪.陶渊明之思想与清谈之关系[A].金明馆丛稿初编[M].上海:上海古籍版社,1980.
[11]沈德潜.说诗晬语[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1979.
[12]袁行霈.陶渊明集笺注[M].北京:中华书局,2003.
[13]陈 来.有无之境:王阳明哲学的精神[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[14]周敦颐.周濂溪集[M].上海:商务印书馆,1936.
[15]朱杰人,等.朱子全书(第13册)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社; 合肥:安徽教育出版社,2002.

相似文献/References:

[1]龚 斌.再论陶渊明《赠长沙公》诗[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,(04):110.
 GONG Bin.Reconsidering TAO Yuanming’s Poem Zeng Chang Sha Gong[J].,2016,(04):110.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-02-28作者简介:曹 虹(1958-),女,江苏南通人,南京大学文学院教授、博士生导师。研究方向为中国古代文学、域外汉学。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01