[1]宋丽红.测验Q矩阵中属性指定、选择和验证方法[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,(01):80-87.
 SONG Lihong.Attribute Specification,Selection and Proof Methods of in the Test Q-matrix[J].,2017,(01):80-87.
点击复制

测验Q矩阵中属性指定、选择和验证方法()
分享到:

《江西师范大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2017年01期
页码:
80-87
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-01-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Attribute Specification,Selection and Proof Methods of in the Test Q-matrix
作者:
宋丽红
江西师范大学 初等教育学院,江西 南昌 330022
Author(s):
SONG Lihong
Elementary Education College,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330022,China
关键词:
认知诊断评估 测验Q矩阵 属性指定 属性选择 属性验证
Keywords:
cognitive diagnostic assessment test Q-matrix attribute specification attribute selection attribute proof
分类号:
G449
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在认知诊断评估中,构建正确测验Q矩阵十分关键但比较困难。本文在简要介绍认知诊断评估之后,从认知诊断模型视角,重点阐述和评价了知名模型或框架下(规则空间模型、属性层级模型、融合模型、回归树、确定性输入噪音与门模型、证据中心设计和认知设计系统)测验Q矩阵中属性指定、选择和验证的方法,指出了各方法的优势和劣势。最后,归纳了测验Q矩阵构建的一般性步骤和方法,并讨论了未来可能研究方向。
Abstract:
In cognitive diagnostic assessment,to build up the right test Q-matrix is crucial but difficult.From the perspective of the cognitive diagnostic model,the paper elaborates and evaluates attribute specification,selection and proof techniques in the test Q-matrix under the famous models or frameworks(Rule Space model,attribute hierarchy model,fusion model,return tree,deterministic input noisy AND-gate model,evidence center design and cognitive design system),points out the advantages and disadvantages of each method,summarizes the general steps and methods of the test Q-matrix construction,and discusses possible future research directions.

参考文献/References:

[1]丁树良,罗 芬,汪文义.认知诊断分类中心的确定[J].心理学探新,2013,33(5).
[2]Tatsuoka,K.K.Cognitive assessment:An introduction to the rule space method[M].New York:Taylor & Francis Group,2009.
[3]DeCarlo,L.T.Recognizinguncertainty in the Q-Matrix via a bayesian extension of the DINA model[J].Applied Psychological Measurement,2012,36(6).
[4]Jang,E.E.Cognitive diagnostic assessment of L2 reading comprehension ability:Validity arguments for Fusion model application to LanguEdge assessment[J].Language Testing,2009,26(1).
[5]Rupp,A.A.& J.Templin.The effects of Q-matrix misspecification on parameter estimates and classification accuracy in the DINA model[J].Educational and Psychological Measurement,2008,68(1).
[6]汪文义,宋丽红.教育认知诊断评估理论与技术研究[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2015.
[7]Buck,G.,Tatsuoka,K.K.,& Kostin,I.The subskills of reading:Rule-space analysis of a multiple-choice test of second language reading comprehension[J].Language Testing,1997,47(3).
[8]Buck,G.,et al.Development,selection and validation of a set of cognitive and linguistic attributes for the SAT-I verbal sentence completion section(RR-98-23)[M].Princeton,NJ:Educational Testing Services,1998.
[9]孙佳楠,等.基于Q矩阵和广义距离的认知诊断方法[J].心理学报,2011,43(9).
[10]Wang,C.,& M.J.Gierl.Using the attribute hierarchy method to make diagnostic inferences about examinees’ cognitive skills in critical reading[J].Journal of Educational Measurement,2011,48(2).
[11]Gierl,M.J.,Alves,C.& Majeau,R.T.Using the attribute hierarchy method to make diagnosticinferences about examinees’ knowledge and skills in mathematics:An operational implementation of cognitive diagnostic assessment[J].International Journal of Testing,2010,10(4).
[12]丁树良,杨淑群,汪文义.可达矩阵在认知诊断测验编制中的重要作用[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2010,34(5).
[13]Hartz,S.M.A bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities:Blending theory with practicality[D].University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,2002.
[14]Jang,E.E.A validity narrative Effects of reading skills diagnosis on teaching and learning[D].University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,2005.
[15]Gao,L.Y.Toward a cognitive processing model of MELAB reading test item performance[C].Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment,4.
[16]Sheehan,K.M.A tree-based approach to proficiency scaling and diagnostic assessment[J].Journal of Educational Measurement,1997,34(4)2.
[17]de la Torre,J.An empirically based method of Q-matrix validation for the DINA model:Development and applications[J].Journal of Educational Measurement,2008,45(4).
[18]涂冬波,蔡 艳,戴海琦.基于DINA模型的Q矩阵修正方法[J].心理学报,2012,44(4).
[19]Liu,J.,Xu,G.,& Ying.Z.Data-driven learning of Q-matrix[J].Applied Psychological Measurement,2012,36(7).
[20]Chiu,C.-Y.Statisticalrefinement of the Q-matrix in cognitive diagnosis[J].Applied Psychological Measurement,2013,37(8).
[21]Chen,P et al.On-line calibration methods for the DINA model with independent attributes in CA-CAT[J].Psychometrika,2012,77(2).
[22]陈 平,辛 涛.认知诊断计算机化自适应测验中在线标定方法的开发[J].心理学报,2011,43(6).
[23]陈 平,辛 涛.认知诊断计算机化自适应测验中的项目增补[J].心理学报,2011,43(7).
[24]汪文义,丁树良.题库结构对原始题在线属性标定准确性之影响研究[J].心理科学,2012,35(2)6.
[25]汪文义,丁树良,游晓锋.计算机化自适应诊断测验中原始题的属性标定[J].心理学报,2011,43(8).
[26]喻晓锋,等.使用似然比D2统计量的题目属性定义方法[J].心理学报,2015,47(3).
[27]喻晓锋,等.基于作答数据的模型参数和Q矩阵联合估计[J].心理学报,2015,47(2).
[28]汪文义,宋丽红,丁树良.基于探索性因素分析的Q矩阵标定方法[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(2).

相似文献/References:

[1]高旭亮,涂冬波.参数化认知诊断模型:心理计量特征、比较及其转换[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,(01):88.
 GAO Xuliang,TU Dongbo.Diagnosis Model Based on Parametrization Cognition:Psychological Measurement Characteristics,Comparison and Transformation[J].,2017,(01):88.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-04-10基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(编号:31500909,31360237,31160203,30860084); 全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题(编号:DHA150285); 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(编号:13YJC880060); 江西省自然科学基金项目(编号:20161BAB212044); 江西省教育科学2013年度一般课题(编号:13YB032); 江西省教育厅科技计划项目(编号:GJJ13207)作者简介:宋丽红(1981-),女,江西新干人,博士,江西师范大学讲师。研究方向为教育和心理测量。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01