[1]汪群红,宋志强.俞长城制义理论述评[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,(05):115-123.
 WANG Qunhong,SONG Zhiqiang.A Review of YU Changcheng’s Critical Theory of Zhi Yi[J].,2017,(05):115-123.
点击复制

俞长城制义理论述评()
分享到:

《江西师范大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2017年05期
页码:
115-123
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-11-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Review of YU Changcheng’s Critical Theory of Zhi Yi
作者:
汪群红 宋志强
江西师范大学 文学院,江西 南昌 330022
Author(s):
WANG Qunhong SONG Zhiqiang
School of Chinese Language and Literature,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330022,China
关键词:
俞长城 制义 选本 批评
Keywords:
YU Changcheng Zhi Yi anthology criticism
分类号:
I206.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
清初俞长城编选的《可仪堂一百二十名家制义》,对制义史及制义理论的研究具有重要的参考价值。俞长城重视制义明道作用,论自有文字以来,设科取士,未有精于制义者。他认为制义是义理与文章,逻辑与历史并重的文体; 倡导以“古文为时文”的八股文体制; 注重制义风格形成及变化与作者人品、学识、经历的紧密联系。他基本认同清初统治者提倡的制义“清真雅正”风格,但对具雄厚风、有风骨的制义大加称赞,取法甚广,并非完全恪守官方的立场。
Abstract:
It is very important for us to re-explore the great value of YU Changcheng’s Ke Yi Tang Yi Bai Er Shi Ming Jia Zhi Yi,which edited by YU Changcheng at the beginning of the Qing Dynasty.He claimed that we should paid attention to the value of Zhi Yi(also called the Eight-part Essay),which could clarify the function of Dao.Since the written word emerged the Imperial Examination was set to select officials,nobody was skilled in it.YU thought that Eight-part Essays is a kind of style which combined the Dao and texts,taking the logic and the historical narration as same importance.He appealed to people to write in the style of the Chinese classical writings.On the other hand,this style formed by some factors of authors as characters,wisdom,experience,etc.He approves basically the style “fresh,honest,elegant,upright” advocated by the early Qing rulers,and praised Zhi Yi with abundant and personalized style.He was not fully committed to the official position.

参考文献/References:

[1]张廷玉,等.明史(第六册)[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[2]俞长城.可仪堂一百二十名家制义[M].康熙三十八年刻本.
[3]俞长城.国朝程墨前集小引[A].俞宁世文集[M].四库全书未收书辑刊(第09辑,第21册)[Z].北京:北京出版社,1997.
[4]詹 锳.文心雕龙义证[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989.
[5]焦 循.孟子正义[M].北京:中华书局,1987.
[6]钱基博.中国文学史[[M].北京:中华书局,1993
[7]李光地.榕村语录[[M].陈祖武点校.北京:中华书局,1995.
[8]方 苞.钦定四书文[M].王同舟,李澜校注.武汉:武汉大学出版社,2009.
[9]刘久顺.论李伯亢对科举制度的否定及其对选官制度的探索[J].中国文学研究,2016,(1).
[10]高明扬.文体学视野下的科举八股文研究[M].昆明:云南人民出版社,2012.
[11]王 炜.明代八股文选家考论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2015.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-03-15基金项目:2014年江西省高校人文社科基地招标项目“中国传统文化背景下的文学观念研究”作者简介:汪群红(1968-),女,江西南昌人,文学博士,江西师范大学文学院、当代形态文艺学研究中心教授、硕士生导师。研究方向为中国文学批评史。宋志强(1988-),男,江西永丰人,江西师范大学文学院硕士生。研究方向为中国文学批评史。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01