[1]刘方喜.机不尽言·言不尽意:人工智能“意义”生产工艺学批判[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,(03):36-44.
　LIU Fangxi.Machine Failing to Adequately Express Its Meaning:Criticism of the “Meaning” Production Technology of Artificial Intelligence[J].,2021,(03):36-44.
点击复制

机不尽言·言不尽意:人工智能“意义”生产工艺学批判()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2021年03期
页码:
36-44
栏目:
文艺理论
出版日期:
2021-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Machine Failing to Adequately Express Its Meaning:Criticism of the “Meaning” Production Technology of Artificial Intelligence
文章编号:
1000-579(2021)03-0036-09
作者:
刘方喜
中国社会科学院 文学研究所,北京 100732
Author(s):
LIU Fangxi
Institute of Literature,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100732,China
关键词:
人工智能;  意义;  机器系统;  文字系统;  人脑系统
Keywords:
artificial intelligence;  meaning;  machine system;  writing system;  human brain system
分类号:
I206
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
作为漫长的自然进化的产物,人脑神经元系统是人身性的意义生产工具,而作为人类文化创造的产物,文字语言系统、人工智能机器系统则是非人身性的意义生产工具。书不尽言、言不尽意,非人身性的文字系统不足以充分表达人身性的人脑和口语系统之意义,体现了人的存在的有限性,而人又通过不断改进和发展这种生产工具的无限过程来超越这种有限性。机不尽言,非人身性的人工智能机器系统不足以充分表达文字系统进而人脑和口语系统之意义,这同样体现了人的有限性,而人同样可以通过不断改进和发展这种生产工具的无限过程来超越这种有限性。一部意义生产工具创造和发展的无限的过程,就是人类不断从生物性人身限制下把内蕴于自身的天然禀赋解放出来而迈向自由王国的进步史。只有超越文学隐喻和资本主义主流意识形态叙事,才能充分揭示人工智能划时代的社会文化意义,而马克思生产工艺学批判对此有重要理论启示。
Abstract:
As the product of natural evolution,the human brain neuron system is the meaningful production tool of the human body.While,as the product of human culture,writing language system and artificial intelligence machine system are impersonal tools of meaning production.The words cannot fully convey the meaning,namely,impersonal writing systems are insufficient to fully express the meaning of the human brain and spoken language systems,which reflects the limitation of human.The machine cannot adequately express its meaning,which means inhuman AI machine systems are insufficient to fully express the meaning of the written system as well as human brain and spoken system,which also reflects the finitude of man.To solve both problems above,man breaks this limitation by continually improving and developing an infinite process of the tool of production.The infinite process of the creation and development of production tool is the history of human beings' progress towards freedom by constantly liberating the natural endowments inherent from the limitations of the biological body.The epoch-making socio-cultural significance of artificial intelligence can be fully revealed only by transcending the literary metaphor and the narrative of the mainstream ideology of capitalism,which can be enlightened by Marx's criticism of production technology.

参考文献/References:

[1]扎卡达基斯.人类的终极命运:从旧石器时代到人工智能的未来[M].陈朝,译.北京:中信出版集团,2017.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集(第42卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1979.
[3]马克思恩格斯全集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1960.
[4]丹宁,马特尔.伟大的计算原理[M].罗英伟,等译.北京:机械工业出版社,2017.
[5]库兹韦尔.奇点临近[M].李庆城,等译.北京:机械工业出版社,2017.
[6]维纳.控制论[M].郝季仁,译.北京:科学出版社,1963.
[7]马克思恩格斯全集(第23卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
[8]马克思恩格斯全集(第46卷上册)[M].北京:人民出版社,1979.
[9]马克思恩格斯全集(第20卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1971.

相似文献/References:

[1]陆正兰,李俊欣.从“理性的人”到“游戏的人”:游戏的意义理论研究[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,(05):59.
　LU Zhenglan,LI Junxin.From “Homo Sapien” to “Homo Ludens”:a Theoretical Study on the Signification of Game[J].,2020,(03):59.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-12-19
作者简介:刘方喜(1966-),男,江苏扬州人,中国社会科学院文学研究所研究员、博士生导师,中国中外文艺理论学会副会长。研究方向为马克思主义技术哲学、经济哲学、文化哲学等。
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-06-20