[1]巩本栋.欧阳修的经学与文学[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,(01):60-71.
　GONG Bendong.OUYANG Xiu's Confucian Classics Studies and Literary Works[J].,2014,(01):60-71.
点击复制

欧阳修的经学与文学()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2014年01期
页码:
60-71
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
OUYANG Xiu's Confucian Classics Studies and Literary Works
作者:
巩本栋;
南京大学文学院,江苏南京,210008
Author(s):
GONG Bendong
关键词:
欧阳修; 经学; 文学
Keywords:
OUYANG Xiu;  Confucian classics;  literature
分类号:
I206.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
欧阳修于六经最深于《易》、《诗》、《春秋》。其解经的突出特点,是本之人情常理,自成一家,尤其是疑《周易》之《系辞》《文言》非孔子所作、《春秋》"三传"不可尽信、《诗》毛郑所注多有讹误、《周礼》亦不完之书等,对北宋疑经风气的形成和后代学术的发展,产生了重要的影响,在中国经学史上占有重要地位。其所以能取得如此成就,实与其家世不显,贫寒无所师,有着密切的关系。他少无所师,故能学出己见,无所束缚,大胆疑经。这为我们解释疑经风气何以会在北宋出现,提供了一个切实的参证。欧阳修的经学对其文学也产生了深刻的影响。无论是其师经需求其意和事信言文观念的提出、对言简意深和简而有法的崇尚,还是对纡徐婉转、平易畅达的美...
Abstract:
OUYANG Xiu spent most of his time in studying Yi,Shi and Chun Qiu in six Confucian classics.The prominent characteristic of his paraphrase of Confucian classics are based on human feelings and common senses,forming his own style.Above all,he suspects Xi Ci and Wen Yan in Zhou Yi are not written by Confucius.And he argues that “three biographies” about Chun Qiu cannot be believed word by word; he points out that there are many errors in Shi noted by MAO and ZHENG,and Zhou Li is an imperfect Confucian classics studies.These views have a significant impact on the formation of the atmosphere of suspecting Confucian classics studies in the Northern Song Dynasty and the academic progresses of later generations,occupying an important position in the history of Chinese classics studies.His achievements are closely related to his ordinary family background,poor living condition and lacking of formal education.He receives no formal education in his childhood.Accordingly,he can put forward his own opinions without any constraints,and doubt boldly Confucian classics studies.This is the reason why this kind of atmosphere of suspecting Confucian classics studies appears in the Northern Song Dynasty.OUYANG Xiu's Confucian classics studies also have a profound influence on his literary works.His pursuing for the aesthetic style which is mild,tactful and fluent can be reasonably explained by his Confucian classics studies.

参考文献/References:

[1]欧阳修.欧阳修诗文集校笺[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2009.
[2]欧阳修.易童子问[A].(欧阳)文忠集[M].影印文渊阁《四库全书》本.
[3]欧阳修.诗本义[M].影印文渊阁《四库全书》本.
[4]屈万里.宋人疑经的风气[A].书佣论学集[M].台北:台湾开明书局,1969.
[5]叶国良.宋人疑经改经考[M].台北:台湾大学出版委员会,1980.
[6]杨新勋.宋代疑经研究[M].北京:中华书局,2007年.
[7]李 焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1992.
[8]徐 松.宋会要辑稿·崇儒[M].郑州:河南大学出版社,2001.
[9]脱 脱,等.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,1977.
[10]孙国栋.唐宋之际社会门第之消融[A].唐宋史论丛(增订本)[M].香港:香港商务印书馆,2000.
[11]晁公武.郡斋读书志校证[M].孙猛校证.上海:上海古籍出版社,1990.
[12]王 称.东都事略[M].影印文渊阁《四库全书》本.
[13]陈振孙.直斋书录解题[M].徐小蛮,顾美华点校.上海:上海古籍出版,1987.
[14]永 瑢,等.四库全书总目[M].北京:中华书局,1965.
[15]柳宗元.答韦中立论师道书[A].柳宗元集[M].北京:中华书局,1979.
[16]邵伯温.邵氏闻见录[M].李剑雄,刘德重点校.北京:中华书局,1983.
[17]释文莹.湘山野录[M].郑世刚,杨立扬点校.北京:中华书局,1984.
[18]韩 琦.故观文殿学士太子少师致仕赠太子太师欧阳公墓志铭[A].安阳集[M].影印文渊阁《四库全书》本.
[19]苏 洵.上欧阳内翰第一书[A].嘉祐集笺注[M].曾枣庄,金成礼笺注.上海:上海古籍出版社,1993.
[20]杨伯峻.春秋左传注[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
[21]苏 轼.六一居士集叙[A].苏轼全集校注[M].张志烈,马德富,周裕锴校注.石家庄:河北人民出版社,2010.

相似文献/References:

[1]李由.“尚有北宋典型”:陆游对欧阳修散文的继承与发展——以游记和题跋为中心[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,(03):69.
　LI You.The Relationship Between LU You and OUYANG Xiu's Prose Writings——Focusing on Travel Notes and Postscripts[J].,2014,(01):69.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国古代文献文化史”(编号:10ZD130)
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01