[1]汪 洋,许 乐,邱 愉.历史演进视角下的铸币税与央行利润[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,(05):65-74.
 WANG Yang,XU Le,QIU Yu.Seigniorage and Central Bank Profit From the Perspective of Historical Evolution[J].,2023,(05):65-74.
点击复制

历史演进视角下的铸币税与央行利润()
分享到:

《江西师范大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2023年05期
页码:
65-74
栏目:
经济与管理
出版日期:
2023-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Seigniorage and Central Bank Profit From the Perspective of Historical Evolution
文章编号:
1000-579(2023)05-0065-10
作者:
汪 洋12 许 乐2 邱 愉1
(1.江西师范大学,江西 南昌 330022; 2.江西财经大学 金融学院,江西 南昌 330013)
Author(s):
WANG Yang12 XU Le2 QIU Yu1
(1.Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330022; 2.School of Finance,Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330013,China)
关键词:
铸币税 中央银行制度 财政部 货币政策
Keywords:
seigniorage central banking system Ministry of Finance monetary policy
分类号:
F820.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
铸币税是基于政府垄断发行货币获得的一种收入。在中央银行发行纸质货币的时代,铸币税是中央政府获得的一笔永远不需要偿还的债务。近期,中国人民银行决定上缴的1万亿净利润,是基于中央银行角度的利差收入,与铸币税是两个概念。估算中国人民银行外汇储备的收益规模后,其结果与央行资产负债表内“其他资产”科目的变化额有所出入,原因有待进一步研究。央行上缴1万亿净利润是中国政府中性财政政策和积极货币政策的表现。
Abstract:
By comparing the income nature of seigniorage in the era of metal money and paper money,the research shows that seigniorage is a kind of income based on the government's monopoly issuance of currency.In an era when central banks issued paper money,seigniorage was a debt acquired by the central government that never had to be repaid.Recently,the People's Bank of China decided to turn in one trillion net profit,which was based on the interest margin income from the perspective of the Central Bank and was different from seigniorage.After estimating the income of the People's Bank of China's foreign exchange reserves,the result is different from the change of the “other assets” account in the central bank's balance sheet,and the reasons need to be further studied.The one trillion yuan net profit handed over by the central bank is a manifestation of the neutral fiscal policy and active monetary policy of the Chinese government.

参考文献/References:

[1]王利民,左大培.关于预算赤字、铸币税和货币扩张通货膨胀税的关系[J].经济研究,1999(8):32-34.
[2]余永定.中国不能走财政赤字货币化的道路[J].金融研究,1999(7):1-5.
[3]范建军.关于政府铸币税收入的理论探讨[J].金融研究,2002(12):1-20.
[4]汪洋.铸币税:基于不同视角的理解[J].经济学(季刊),2005(2):639-662.
[5]张健华,张怀清.人民银行铸币税的测算和运用:1986-2008[J].经济研究,2009(7):79-90.
[6]聂丹.浅析对铸币税、国际铸币税的正确认识与测算[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(5):125-130.
[7]曾康霖.央行铸币税与财政赤字弥补[J].金融研究,2002(9):1-6.
[8]张怀清.论中央银行铸币税与通货膨胀税的关系[J].南方金融,2007(10):28-30.
[9]张怀清.中央银行铸币税的测算[J].世界经济文汇,2010(3):1-17.
[10]张怀清.商业银行铸币税研究[J].金融发展研究,2008(4):12-15.
[11]李翀.关于国际铸币税收益的探讨[J].当代经济研究,2012(8):68-72.
[12]陆前进,庞盈盈.中央银行铸币税、利润和通货膨胀率的非线性关系:基于MIU货币需求函数的理论分析及实证研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2017(4):39-53.
[13]陆前进,庞盈盈.中央银行利润、财政铸币税和最优铸币税的探讨[J].南方经济,2017(6):22-43.
[14]陆前进,朱丽娜.铸币税测算、货币铸币税分解与通货膨胀税[J].学术研究,2014(2):71-77.
[15]Zhao L,Li L.Interest Rate,Money Demand and Seigniorage:The Chinese Hyperinflation 1946-1949[J].China Economic Review,2015(4):169-179.
[16]Hattori T,Oguro K.An Endeavor to Estimate Seigniorage Before the End of and Immediately after the Pacific War[J].Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,2016(3):1-16.
[17]Cutsinger B P,Ingber J S.Seigniorage in the Civil War South[J].Explorations in Economic History,2019(2):74-92.
[18]Quinn S,Roberds W.How Amsterdam Got Fiat Money[J].Journal of Monetary Economics,2014(9):1-12.
[19]Jung S,Kwon O,Mun S.Dollarization,Seigniorage,and Prices:The Case of North Korea[J].Emerging Markets Finance and Trade,2017(11):2463-2475.
[20]Samreth S.Currency Substitution and Seigniorage-maximizing Inflation:the Case of Cambodia[J].Applied Economics,2010(15):1907-1916.
[21]Escario R,Gadea M D,Sabate M.Multicointegration,seigniorage and fiscal sustainability.Spain 1857-2000[J].Journal of Policy Modeling,2012(2):270-283.
[22]Daniel B C.A Graceful Return of the Drachma[J].European Economic Review,2014(5):228-243.
[23]Damjanovic T,Nolan C.Seigniorage-Maximizing Inflation under Sticky Prices[J].Journal of Money,Credit,and Banking,2010(5):503-519.
[24]Bohn F.Political Instability and Seigniorage:An Inseparable Couple-or a Threesome with Debt?[J].Review of International Economics,2019(1):347-366.
[25]Bacchetta P,Perazzi E,van Wincoop E.Self-Fulfilling Debt Crises:What Can Monetary Policy Do?[J].Journal of International Economics,2018(1):119-134.
[26]Prat J,Walter B.An Equilibrium Model of the Market for Bitcoin Mining[J].Journal of Political Economy,2021(8):2415-2452.
[27]陈道富,于涛.央行上缴结存利润具有组合政策效果[EB/OL].(2022-03-24)[2023-06-30].http://www.jwview.com/jingwei/html/03-24/474037.shtml.
[28]管涛.从央行资产负债表角度看上缴储备投资收益的金融影响[EB/OL].(2022-03-21)[2023-06-30].http://www.imi.ruc.edu.cn/IMIsd/7aa36989ff704aeaa8649359c25ad86b.htm.
[29]连平.央行上缴结存利润并不等同于降准[EB/OL].(2022-03-09)[2023-06-30].https://www.yicai.com/news/101342518.html.
[30]管涛.这次央行上缴结存利润更多是财政政策而非货币政策操作[EB/OL].(2022-03-13)[2023-06-30].https://www.yicai.com/news/101346528.html.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-04-01
基金项目:国家社会科学基金哲学社会科学领军人才项目“多重约束下的中国财政政策、货币政策与汇率政策协调配合研究”(编号:22VRC018); 国家社会科学基金重大项目“中央银行的逻辑与现代中央银行制度的建设”(编号:21ZDA045)
作者简介:汪 洋(1972— ),男,江西南昌人,江西师范大学教授、博士生导师。研究方向为货币银行理论与政策、国际金融理论与实务。
许 乐(1986— ),男,江西南昌人,江西财经大学金融学院博士研究生。研究方向为货币银行理论与政策。
邱 愉(1997— ),女,江西南昌人,江西师范大学管理科学与工程研究中心博士研究生。研究方向为货币银行学与国际金融。
本文感谢林正浩、汪泽宇和李骞同学的资料收集和整理工作。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-09-25