[1]龙野.艾南英、张自烈时文之争与晚明时文选政[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,(03):52-56.
 LONG Ye.The Quarrel between AI Nanying and ZHANG Zilie over the Essays Prescribed for Civil Examinations and the Selection and Compiling in the Late Ming Dynasty[J].,2013,(03):52-56.
点击复制

艾南英、张自烈时文之争与晚明时文选政()
分享到:

《江西师范大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2013年03期
页码:
52-56
栏目:
出版日期:
2013-05-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Quarrel between AI Nanying and ZHANG Zilie over the Essays Prescribed for Civil Examinations and the Selection and Compiling in the Late Ming Dynasty
作者:
龙野;
复旦大学中文系,上海,200433
Author(s):
LONG Ye
关键词:
艾南英张自烈时文地域文学传统晚明文学
Keywords:
AI Nanying ZHANG Zilie essays prescribed for civil examinations regional literature tradition literature during the period of the Late Ming Dynasty
分类号:
I206.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
艾南英因时文房选与江左文人发生争论,成为晚明文坛的一段公案。因张溥等的离间策略,艾氏与张自烈就编选时文展开争辩,并认为张自烈的《国朝今文辩》大量抄袭自己编选的《今文定》、《今文待》。有证据表明,张自烈编选时文之举受到了江左文人的唆使,论争实际是艾南英与江左文人矛盾的延续。艾南英强调以江右古文传统改造时文,而张自烈编选时文"重经",与江左重秦汉的文学主张接近。二人论争是地域文学传统之争在时文领域的反映。
Abstract:
The quarrel between AI Nanying and scholars from south of the lower reaches of the Changjiang River became a well-known case in the literary world of the Late Ming Dynasty.The wedge set by ZHANG Fu and others caused AI Nanying to argue fiercely with ZHANG Zilie.AI thought that Guo Chao Jin Wen Bian compiled by ZHANG copied much of Jin Wen Ding and Jin Wen Dai compiled by AI.There was evidence that ZHANG Zilie was instigated by scholars from south of the lower reaches of the Changjiang River to select and compile the essays prescribed for civil examinations.The argument was actually the continuation of contradiction between AI Nanying and scholars from south of the lower reaches of the Changjiang River.AI Nanying emphasized to reform the selection of essays prescribed for civil examinations according to the Jiangxi's traditional ancient style prose,while ZHANG Zilie emphasized classic proses in his selecting and compiling,which was close to the literary view of scholars from south of the lower reaches of the Changjiang River who emphasized the Qin-Han literature.The quarrel between AI Nanying and ZHANG Zilie reflects argument over the regional literary tradition of the essays prescribed for civil examinations.

参考文献/References:

[1]冯小禄.文社宗派性格——艾南英陈子龙之战再检讨.云南师范大学学报(哲社版),2006,(1).
[2]曾 肖.文章作法自不同,十年论争缘意气——论明末时文大家艾南英与复社之关系[J].安徽大学学报(哲社版),2011,(4).
[3]张自烈.芑山文集[M].四库禁毁书丛刊(集部第166册)[Z].北京:北京出版社,1997.
[4]吴应箕.楼山堂集[M].续修四库全书(第1389册)[Z].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
[5]刘 城.峄桐文集[M].四库禁毁书丛刊(集部第121册)[Z].北京:北京出版社,1997.
[6]艾南英.天傭子集[M].四库禁毁书丛刊补编(第72册)[Z].北京:北京出版社,2005.
[7]张自烈.芑山文集[M].康熙二十六年(1687)俞王爵刻二十四卷本.
[8]陆世仪.复社纪略[M].续修四库全书(第438册)[Z].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
[9]周亮工.周亮工全集[M].朱天曙编校.南京:凤凰出版社,2008.
[10]范 方.默镜居文集[M].四库禁毁书丛刊(集部第133册)[Z].北京:北京出版社,1997.
[11]侯方域.侯方域集校笺[M].王树林校笺.郑州:中州古籍出版社,1992.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01