[1]陈元锋.论“嘉祐四友”的进退分合与交游唱和[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,(01):72-81.
　CHEN Yuanfeng.On Jiayou Four Friends' Advance and Retreat, Departure and Union, and Keeping Company to Write Responding Poetry[J].,2014,(01):72-81.
点击复制

论“嘉祐四友”的进退分合与交游唱和()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2014年01期
页码:
72-81
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
On Jiayou Four Friends' Advance and Retreat, Departure and Union, and Keeping Company to Write Responding Poetry
作者:
陈元锋;
山东师范大学文学院,山东济南,250014
Author(s):
CHEN Yuanfeng
关键词:
“嘉祐四友”; 熙宁; 元丰; 交游唱和
Keywords:
“Jiayou Four Friends”;  Xining;  Yuanfeng;  keeping company to write responding poetry
分类号:
I206.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
王安石、司马光、吕公著、韩维号称"嘉祐四友",他们在嘉祐中结交游集,熙宁中同时进入朝廷权力中心,因政治立场的对立而产生分化。"四友"具有素朴简淡、不慕纷华的文化性格,在科举改制问题上,均属取消诗赋一派,但司马光等人对荆公新学之专断与驳杂则持批评态度。"四友"在诗坛的交游酬唱始末与其政治上的进退分合轨迹正相吻合,可以清楚地分为嘉祐、熙丰两个阶段。汴京的文学生态因新党专权而恶化,司马光、吕公著、韩维及范镇退居洛阳、颍昌等地,却获得了难得的宽松自由的创作环境。他们优游山水园林,诗酒雅集,闲吟代替了讽谕,林泉高致掩盖了朝堂纷争,仍曲折透射了政治干预文学的阴影。
Abstract:
WANG Anshi,SIMA Guang,Lü Gongzhu,HAN Wei were known as “Jiayou Four Friends”.They made friends,toured,partied in Jianyou,and then entered the royal power Centrum simultaneously in Xining,but divided because their political stands were opposite.The cultural characters of “Jiayou Four Friends” were simple,plain and elegant,they all belonged to the School of cancelling Poetry and Fu on the issue of reform of imperial examination,but SIMA Guang and two others criticized WANG Anshi's neodoxy,which was arbitrary and heterogeneous.The beginning and end of making friends and writing responding poetry of “Jiayou Four Friends” conform with their trajectories of advance and retreat,departure and union in the political circles,which could be clearly divided into two stages:Jiayou,Xifeng.Literary surroundings of Bianliang became deteriorated because of the autocracy of the new party.SIMA Guang,LV Gongzhu,HAN Wei and FAN Zhen relegated to Luoyang,Yingchang and other places.However,they received a rare loose free authoring environment.They passed their days in hills and waters,reciting poetry,drinking and partying.Leisurely reciting poems took the place of satirization,the elegant taste covered up the government dissension.The shadow which politics intervened in literature was tortuously respected.

参考文献/References:

[1]徐 度.却扫编[M].文渊阁四库全书[Z].(第863册).上海:上海古籍出版社,1987.
[2]司马光.司马温公集编年笺注[M].李之亮笺注.成都:巴蜀书社,2009.
[3]曾枣庄,刘 琳.全宋文[M].上海:上海辞书出版社; 合肥:安徽教育出版社,2006.
[4]邵伯温.邵氏闻见录[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[5]徐乾学.资治通鉴后编[M].文渊阁四库全书[Z](第343册).上海:上海古籍出版社,1987.
[6]王安石.王荆公文集笺注[M].李之亮笺注.成都:巴蜀书社,2005.
[7]脱 脱,等.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,1977.
[8]王 称.东都事略[M].文渊阁四库全书[Z](第382册).上海:上海古籍出版社,1987.
[9]杜大珪.名臣碑传琬琰集[M].文渊阁四库全书[Z](第450册).上海:上海古籍出版社,1987.
[10]王 珪.华阳集[M].丛书集成初编本.上海:商务印书馆,1935.
[11]苏 轼.苏轼文集[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[12]冯 琦.宋史纪事本末[M].陈邦瞻增辑.长春:吉林出版集团,2005.
[13]王安石.王荆文公诗笺注[M].李壁注.上海:上海古籍出版社,2010.
[14]欧阳修.欧阳修诗文集校笺[M].洪本健校笺.上海:上海古籍出版社,2009.
[15]北京大学古文献研究所编.全宋诗[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1992.
[16]苏 颂.苏魏公文集[M].北京:中华书局,1988.
[17]王辟之.渑水燕谈录[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
[18]吕本中.紫薇诗话[A].何文焕辑.历代诗话[M].中华书局,1981.
[19]葛兆光.洛阳与汴梁:文化重心与政治重心的分离——关于11世纪80年代理学历史与思想的考察[J].历史研究,2000,(5).
[20]苏 轼.苏轼诗集合注[M].冯应榴辑注.上海:上海古籍出版社,2001.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家社会科学基金项目“北宋翰林学士与文学研究”(编号:06BZW034)
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01