[1]田艳芳.极化、宏观政策变动与社会冲突——来自拉美的实例[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,(03):45-51.
　TIAN Yanfang.Polarization,Changing of Macropolicy,and Social Conflicts——A Case Study of Latin America[J].,2017,(03):45-51.
点击复制

极化、宏观政策变动与社会冲突——来自拉美的实例()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2017年03期
页码:
45-51
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-07-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Polarization,Changing of Macropolicy,and Social Conflicts——A Case Study of Latin America
作者:
田艳芳
华东政法大学 政治学与公共管理学院,上海 201620
Author(s):
TIAN Yanfang
School of Political Science and Public Management,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620,China
关键词:
极化;  宏观政策变动;  社会冲突
Keywords:
polarization;  changes of macroeconomic policy;  social conflicts
分类号:
D58; F113
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
上世纪中期拉丁美洲大多数国家在“中等收入陷阱”中徘徊,分析其国家历史发现,严重收入分化和经济社会分化是导致“中等收入陷阱”的主要原因。不同部门和不同阶层之间的割裂和对立加剧了整个社会的极化,而收入分配不均正是极化的表现。政治极化使得绝大部分公共支出倾斜到非生产性领域,这进一步给宏观经济政策带来了巨大的压力,并且直接导致了经济增长停滞、社会冲突加剧、政权更迭频繁。本文引用一个有两个参与者的博弈模型,加入决策者的偏好极化,结合拉丁美洲的历史,证实了在收入两极化严重的社会中,公共资源过度分配和过度开发的可能性更
Abstract:
In the middle of the last century,most of the Latin American countries were stagnated in “Middle Income Trap”.The social and economic polarization was the leading factor.The separation of sectors and groups amplified the polarization,which manifested by income gaps.The political polarization led most of the public expenditure on the non-productive areas,which brought great pressure on the economic macropolicy,and directly led to economic stagnation,intensifying the social conflicts,and frequent transfers of regimes.This paper takes a game model with two participants,adds with leaning polarization,combining the history of Latin America,and proves that in the highly polarized soceity there is a greater chance that the public resources are overallocated and overexploited.Accordingly,the large-scale social conflicts might break out.

参考文献/References:

[1]〔美〕奥尔森.国家兴衰探源——经济增长、滞涨与社会僵化[M].吕应中,等译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[2]〔美〕丹尼斯·缪勒.公共选择理论[M].杨春学,等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999.
[3]Jaejoon Woo.Social Polarization,Lndustrialization,and Fiscal Instability:Theory and Evidence[J].Journal of Development Economics,2003,(72).
[4]Jaejoon Woo.Social Polarization,Fiscal Instability and Growth[J].European Economic Review,2005,(49).
[5]Rodrik,D.Understanding Economic Policy reform[J].Journal of Economic Literature,1996,(1).
[6]Gavin,M.,Perotti,R.Fiscal Policy in Latin America[A].In Bernanke,B.S.,Rotemberg,J.J.(Eds.),NBER Macroeconomics Annual[M].Cambridge,M A:MIT Press,1997.
[7]Jeffrey D.Sachs.Social Conflict and Populist Policies in Latin America[J].NBER Working Paper,1989,(2897).
[8]Jeffrey D.Sachs,John Williamson,External Debt and Macroeconomic Performance in Latin America and East Asia[J].Bookings Papers on Economic Activities,1985,(2).
[9]Mallon,R.and J.V.Sourrouille.Economic Policymaking in a Conflict Society:the Argentine Case[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1975.
[10]Drake,P.W.Conclusion:Requiem for Populism?[A].in M.L.Conliff(ed.).Latin American Populism in Comparative Perspective[M].Albuquerque:University of New Mexico Press,1982.
[11]〔秘鲁〕赫尔南多˙德˙索托.另一条道路[M].于海生 译.北京:华夏出版社,2007.
[12]田艳芳.转型期中国社会冲突的经济制度肇因与风险化解[J].当代世界与社会主义,2014,(1).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-06-08基金项目:华东政法大学科研项目“转型期中国社会冲突的经济制度成因和化解机制研究”(编号:15HZK026)作者简介:田艳芳(1981-),女,河南鹤壁人,博士,华东政法大学政治学与公共管理学院副教授。研究方向为公共经济学、政治经济学。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01