[1]温庆新.鲁迅的“文人习气”、杂文创作与小说史研究——以《中国小说史略》名类讽刺小说与谴责小说为中心[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,(03):96-103.
　WEN Qingxin.On LU Xun’s Literati Habits,Essays and Researches of the Chinese Fiction History——Focusing on the Satirical and Misanthropic Fictions Commented in A Short History of Chinese Fiction[J].,2017,(03):96-103.
点击复制

鲁迅的“文人习气”、杂文创作与小说史研究——以《中国小说史略》名类讽刺小说与谴责小说为中心()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2017年03期
页码:
96-103
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-07-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
On LU Xun’s Literati Habits,Essays and Researches of the Chinese Fiction History——Focusing on the Satirical and Misanthropic Fictions Commented in A Short History of Chinese Fiction
作者:
温庆新
扬州大学 文学院,江苏 扬州 225002
Author(s):
WEN Qingxin
School of Literature,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou,Jiangsu 225002,China
关键词:
《中国小说史略》;  讽刺小说;  谴责小说;  文人习气;  “个人的批评”
Keywords:
A Short History of Chinese Fiction;  satirical fictions;  misanthropic fictions;  literati habits;  “personal criticism”
分类号:
I210.97
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
作为中国小说史奠基之作的《中国小说史略》在多次修订后,鲁迅对讽刺小说与谴责小说的认识经历了由单列谴责小说到讽刺小说、谴责小说镳道并驱且以褒讽刺小说而贬谴责小说为主的变化过程。这种做法不仅受鲁迅“领袖欲旺盛”、“太易流于感情之论”等文人习气的影响,带有浓厚的“个人的批评”色彩。而且,鲁迅褒讽刺小说的做法与其推崇讽刺作品的文学创作行为有关,是其为破除彼时社会有关讽刺作品的偏见、寻求历史渊源的支撑而对讽刺作品进行正名之目的使然。这些导致《中国小说史略》相关论述多有偏离小说史的演进实情之处,以致体系不严、论断随意
Abstract:
With the continuous revision of A Short History of Chinese Fiction,LU Xun’s understanding of the satirical fictions and the misanthropic fictions had gone through the process from the misanthropic fictions to the coexistence of the satirical fictions and misanthropic fictions,praising the satirical fictions and playing down the misanthropic fictions.This practice not only was affected by LU Xun’s literati habits,such as strong leader desire,too easy to fall into the emotional judgment,etc.,but also had a strong “personal criticism” color.Moreover,the practice of praising the satirical fictions was also closely related to the literary creation behavior of respecting the satirical fictions,so as to eliminate people’s prejudice of the satirical fictions at that time,and seek the support of historical origin and rectify people’s attitude to the satirical fictions,which led to the following situations:many statements related to A Short History of Chinese Fiction deviated from the evolution truth of Chinese fiction history,the system was not strict,the judgment was too casual,the unity of history and logic,theory and facts lacked,these facts had a profound impact on the later researchers in Chinese fiction history.

参考文献/References:

[1]欧阳健.《中国小说史略》批判[M].太原:山西人民出版社,2008.
[2]欧阳健.“讽刺”与“谴责”的错位与误读[J].厦门教育学院学报,2007,(3).
[3]鲁 迅.小说史大略[M].中国现代文艺资料丛刊(第4辑)[Z].上海:上海文艺出版社,1979.
[4]鲁 迅.中国小说史大略[M].鲁迅研究资料(第17辑)[Z].天津:天津人民出版社,1986.
[5]胡 适.中国小说考证[M].上海:上海书店出版社,1980.
[6]魏绍昌.孽海花资料(增订本)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1982.
[7]佚 名.清代述异[A].清朝野史大观(卷十一)[M].北京:中华书局,1934.
[8]苏雪林.我论鲁迅[M].台湾新北市:传记文学出版社,1979.
[9]林语堂:追悼胡通之先生[J].海外论坛(三卷四号),1962-04-01.
[10]周质平.胡适与鲁迅[M].台北市:时报文化出版企业有限公司,1988.
[11]欧阳健.晚清小说史[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,1997.
[12]周作人.瓜豆集[M].香港:九龙实用书局,1969.
[13]胡 适.胡适日记全编(第4册)[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社,2001.
[14]温庆新.“以小说见才学者”辨正及其小说史叙述意义——兼及“才学小说”的概念使用[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2014,(4).
[15]鲁 迅.鲁迅全集[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2005.
[16]温庆新.中国小说起源于“神话与传说”辨正——以《中国小说史略》为中心[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2014,(5).
[17]冯雪峰.雪峰文集[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1985.
[18]许钦文,等.鲁迅先生二三事:前期弟子忆鲁迅[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,2000.
[19]温庆新.“五四”白话小说、平民文学与《中国小说史略》的发生机制[J].中国文化研究,2016,(3).
[20]温庆新.近现代尚鬼神妖怪之风、“国民性批判”与《中国小说史略》——以“六朝之鬼神志怪书”、“明之神魔小说”为例(上)[J].上海鲁迅研究,2012,(4).
[21]温庆新.示范:鲁迅建构中国小说史的另一途径——以鲁迅所编古代小说作品集和资料集为中心[J].内江师范学院学报,2016,(7).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-12-28基金项目:国家社科基金后期资助项目“鲁迅《中国小说史略》辨正”(编号:15FZW057)作者简介:温庆新(1987-),男,福建泉州人,扬州大学博士后,湖南师范大学讲师。研究方向为小说及小说史文献、明清目录学史、近现代学术史。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01