[1]彭 佳.中项漩涡:文化标出性与格雷马斯方阵[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,(05):92-97.
　PENG Jia.Middle-item Vortex:Cultural Markedness and Greimas Square[J].,2017,(05):92-97.
点击复制

中项漩涡:文化标出性与格雷马斯方阵()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2017年05期
页码:
92-97
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-11-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Middle-item Vortex:Cultural Markedness and Greimas Square
作者:
彭 佳
西南民族大学 外国语学院,四川 成都 610041
Author(s):
PENG Jia
College of Foreign Languages & Cultures,Southwest University for Nationalities,Chengdu,Sichuan 610041,China
关键词:
中项;  标出性;  格雷马斯方阵
Keywords:
middle-item;  markedness;  Greimas Square
分类号:
G0
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
文化标出性理论是动态的文化关系模式,在此模式中,中项是多元的混合,它的摇摆和偏边对文化标出性起到决定性作用,并且,它的幅度和受力大小是衡量文化宽容度的重要指标。用格雷马斯方阵各要素之间关系来检视文化标出性理论,可以证明,中项融合了非正非负、亦正亦负的元素,是漩涡式的存在。文化标出性理论的三分法可以分化为多元的开放结构,是一个充满对话性和活力的符号学模式。
Abstract:
The theory of cultural markedness is a semiotic model describing the dynamic developments of cultures,in the model the middle-item is a cultural hybridization,its swing and deviation plays a decisive role in cultural markedness,and its scope and force size are important indicators measuring cultural tolerance.Comparing the model of cultural markedness with Greimas Square,this paper points out that middle-item is like a vortext which integrates the factors between the positive and the negative,and this tripartite relation of the theory of culture markedness can be divided into multi-dimensional open structure,which is a dialogic and dynamic model of semiotics.

参考文献/References:

[1]蔡秀枝,彭佳.符号学与空间理论的遇合:蔡秀枝教授访谈[J].符号与传媒,2012,(5).
[2]C.S.Peirce.Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1931-1958.
[3]Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen,Dai Weiwei,Zhao Xingzh.Extensions of Charles S.Peirce:An Interview with Anti-Veikko Pietarinen[J].符号与传媒,2014,(9).
[4]Susan Petrilli,Augusto Ponzio.Semiotics Unbounded:Interpretive Routes through the Open Network of Signs[M].Toronto:University of Toronto Press,2005.
[5]赵毅衡.符号学[M].台北:新锐文创,2012.
[6]彭 佳,王万宏.“中项”与文化“标出性”的改变[J].江苏社会科学,2011,(5).
[7]胡易容.论文化标出性翻转的成因与机制——对赵毅衡一个观点的扩展[J].江苏社会科学,2011,(5).
[8]A J Greimas & Joseph Courtes.Semiotics and Language:An Analytical Dictionary[M].Bloomington:University of Indiana Press,1982.
[9]A J Greimas lgirdas Julien,Fran?ois Rastier.The Interaction of Semiotic Constraints[J].Yale French Studies,1968,(41).
[10]Mary Douglas.Purity and Danger:An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo[M].London:APK Paperbacks,1984.
[11]Carol Myers-Scotton.Codes and Consequences:Choosing Linguistic Varieties[C].New York,Oxford:Oxford University Press,1998.
[12]Sandra Antulov,Bertoa Mislava.‘Beyond Morality.’Discourse on Homosexuality in Croatian Newspapers from the Sociosemiotic Perspective:Comparison of Two Periods.KNJIEVNOST I KULTURA[EB/OL].http://www.sic-journal.org/ArticleView.aspx?aid=81#
[13]彭 佳.论文化“标出性”诸问题[J].符号与传媒,2011,(2).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-04-30基金项目:国家重大社科基金项目“当今中国文化现状与发展的符号学研究”(编号:13&ZD123); 2017年度西南民族大学中央高校项目“符号现象学基本问题研究”(编号:2017SZYQN75)作者简介:彭 佳(1980-),女,四川泸州人,西南民族大学副教授,四川大学符号学-传媒学研究所成员。研究方向为符号学、艺术理论批评。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01