[1]吴仁平,廖宝光.走出实践唯物主义研究困境的思考[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,(06):34-41.
　WU Renping,LIAO Baoguang.Thinking About How to Get Out of the Dilemma of the Practical Materialism Study[J].,2017,(06):34-41.
点击复制

走出实践唯物主义研究困境的思考()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2017年06期
页码:
34-41
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Thinking About How to Get Out of the Dilemma of the Practical Materialism Study
作者:
吴仁平;  廖宝光
江西师范大学 马克思主义学院,江西 南昌 330021
Author(s):
WU Renping;  LIAO Baoguang
School of Marxism,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330022,China
关键词:
实践唯物主义研究困境;  本体论;  实践的泛化;  传统哲学教科书
Keywords:
dilemma of practical materialism;  ontology;  practical generalization;  traditional philosophy textbooks
分类号:
B01
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
实践唯物主义研究不仅深化了对马克思主义哲学本质、内容等重大理论问题的理解,而且进一步推进了马克思主义哲学理论体系的改革以及与当代社会现实的结合。然而,在对实践唯物主义理解的问题上,学术界派别林立、观点庞杂,导致实践唯物主义的研究逐步陷入了困境。面对这种困境,不能因此而放弃对实践唯物主义的研究。相反,应该在总结和反思30多年来实践唯物主义研究的基础上,认真思考存在的问题并解决问题,以推动实践唯物主义研究向前发展。走出实践唯物主义研究困境要解决的问题很多,最突出的问题是:一、摒弃“实践本体论”,坚持“物质本体
Abstract:
The practical materialism study not only deepens the understanding of major theoretical problems such as the essence and the content of Marxist philosophy,and so on,furthermore,it further advances the reform of Marxist philosophy theory system and the combination of Marxist philosophy theory system with contemporary social reality.However,on the understanding of the practical materialism,the academic factions are lined up and the viewpoints about it are complicated,which leads to the practical materialism study gradually get into trouble.In the face of such difficulties,we can’t give up the practical materialism study.On the contrary,on the basis of summarizing and reflecting on the practical materialism study in the past more than 30 years,we should think seriously about existing problems and solve them to promote the development of the practical materialism study.There are many problems to solve if we want to get out of the dilemma of the practical materialism study,the prominent problems are as follows:firstly,abandoning “practical ontology” and insisting on “substance ontology”; secondly,overcoming the theoretical tendency of practical generalization and correctly understanding the objectivity essence of practice; thirdly,overcoming the tendency of totally denying the traditional philosophy textbooks,and correctly evaluating their historical value and theoretical value.

参考文献/References:

[1]李文阁.历史唯物主义何以会成为一个问题[J].学术研究,2011,(1).
[2]黄楠森.重谈我对实践唯物主义的看法[J].毛泽东邓小平思想研究,2010,(10).
[3]马克思恩格斯选集(第4卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[4]列宁选集(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[5]马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[6]马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿[M].北京:人民出版社,2000.
[7]王南湜.论哲学思维的三种范式[J].江海学刊,1999,(5).
[8]李文阁.实践其实是指人的现实生活——实践唯物主义研究之反思[J].哲学动态,2000,(11).
[9]崔唯航.马克思实践观的当代反思[J].湖南科技大学学报,2004,(6).
[10]列宁全集(第38卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1959.
[11]列宁全集(第18卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1988.
[12]陈先达.不能借“实践唯物主义”反辩证唯物主义[N].中国社会科学报,2011-07-28.

相似文献/References:

[1]包彦征,邓辉文.逻辑视阈下人工智能道德的本体论承诺研究[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,(01):87.
　BAO Yanzheng,DENG Huiwen.Research on the Ontological Commitment of Artificial Intelligence Morality From the Perspective of Logic[J].,2022,(06):87.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-08-20作者简介:吴仁平(1955-),男,江西大余人,江西师范大学教授、博士生导师。研究方向为马克思主义哲学。廖宝光(1970-),男,江西赣州人,江西师范大学博士研究生,江西警察学院教授。研究方向为马克思主义中国化。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01