[1]蔡 辉.论我国公益诉讼起诉主体制度的完善[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,(05):116-123.
　CAI Hui.Perfecting the Subject System of Civil Welfare Litigation in China[J].,2018,(05):116-123.
点击复制

论我国公益诉讼起诉主体制度的完善()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年05期
页码:
116-123
栏目:
法学探讨
出版日期:
2018-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Perfecting the Subject System of Civil Welfare Litigation in China
文章编号:
1000-579(2018)05-0116-08
作者:
蔡 辉1; 2
1.中国政法大学 民商经济法学院,北 京 100088; 2.天津科技大学 法政学院,天津 300222
Author(s):
CAI Hui1; 2
1.Civil,Commercial Economic Law School,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088; 2.School of Law and Political Science,Tianjin University of Science and Technology,Tianjin 300222,China
关键词:
环境公益诉讼;  个人诉讼地位;  救济穷尽;  预防原则;  前置程序
Keywords:
environmental civil welfare litigation;  status of individual litigation;  principle of exhaustion of relief;  principle of prevention;  pre-procedure
分类号:
D915.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
现行民事诉讼法没有赋予公民个人公益诉讼的起诉权,但从立法和司法现状而言,社会组织和机关缺乏提起公益诉讼的动力,实践效果也欠佳。公共利益和个人利益的不可区分、在民诉法颁布前个人通过提起私益诉讼达到维护公共利益目的的有益实践、域外诸多赋予个人公益诉讼起诉资格的立法都说明赋予个人公益诉讼的起诉权具有正当性和合理性。通过借鉴救济穷尽原则和预防性原则,个人提起公益诉讼可能导致的滥诉等缺陷可以通过设置起诉前置程序的方式得到有效控制。明确赋予个人在公益诉讼中的起诉地位,并规定其在向环境行政主管部门行使行政救济后方可向法院起诉,明确规定个人起诉的期限和行政机关的审查期限,诉的种类为禁令之诉,环境民事和行政公益诉讼都可以提起,在与其他主体竞合时,应当允许不同主体作为共同诉讼的原告起诉。
Abstract:
The current Civil Procedure Law does not give citizens the right to sue for personal civil welfare litigation.However,from the present situation of legislation and judicature,social organizations and institutions lack the motive force of civil welfare litigation,and the effect of practice is poor.The indistinguishability of civil welfare and personal welfare,and the beneficial practices which individuals initiate private benefit proceedings for the purpose of safeguarding public interest before the enactment of Civil Procedure Law,many legislations outside territory empowering individuals to sue for civil welfare litigation,etc.,which shows that the right to sue the individual civil welfare litigation is justified and reasonable.By drawing lessons from the principle of exhaustion of relief and prevention,the abuse and other defects that individuals initiate civil welfare litigation may cause can be effectively controlled by setting up the way to prosecute the pre-procedure.The status of prosecution in civil welfare litigation should be clearly given to individuals,and the law should stipulate that it may sue the court after exercising administrative relief to the competent administrative department of the environment,specify the duration of individual prosecutions and the period of review of administrative bodies,the type of action is a plea of prohibition,environmental civil and administrative civil welfare litigation can be brought up,when competing with other subjects,different subjects should be allowed to sue as a plaintiff in a joint action.

参考文献/References:

[1]http://legal.people.com.cn/n/2015/0313/c42510-26687979.html.
[2]http://news.163.com/16/0313/09/BI1DR81V00014JB6.htm.
[3]http://newspaper.jcrb.com/2017/20170226/20170226_002/20170226_002_8.htm.
[4]蒋小红.通过公益诉讼推动社会变革—印度公益诉讼制度考察[J].环球法律评论,2006,(3).
[5]郑 磊.宪法审查的穷尽法律救济原则[J].现代法学,2009,(1).
[6]沈福俊.论“穷尽行政救济原则”在我国之适用——我国提起行政诉讼的前置条件分析[J].政治与法律,2004,(2).
[7]白 彦.环境民事公益诉讼原告主体资格问题研究[J].浙江社会科学,2016,(2).
[8]高志宏.我国公益诉讼原告制度的现实考察与应然变革[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2016,(2).
[9]郭雪慧.论公益诉讼主体确定及其原告资格的协调—对《民事诉讼法》第55条的思考[J].政治与法律,2015,(1).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-04-18
基金项目:天津市高等学校人文社会科学研究项目“生态文明视域下农产品质量安全法律规制研究”(编号:20132702)
作者简介:蔡 辉(1978-),女,湖北省丹江口市人,中国政法大学民商经济法学院博士研究生,天津科技大学法政学院讲师,天津科技大学食品战略与管理研究中心研究员。研究方向为民事诉讼法。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-10-20