[1]胡招祺.再论恩格斯历史合力论思想中的几个关键问题[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,(04):110-115.
　HU Zhaoqi.On Some Key Issues in Engels' Theory of Historical Resultant Force[J].,2019,(04):110-115.
点击复制

再论恩格斯历史合力论思想中的几个关键问题()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
110-115
栏目:
哲学研究
出版日期:
2019-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
On Some Key Issues in Engels' Theory of Historical Resultant Force
文章编号:
1000-579(2019)04-0110-06
作者:
胡招祺
河南财经政法大学 经济伦理研究中心,河南 郑州 450046
Author(s):
HU Zhaoqi
Center for Economic and Ethical Research,Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou,Henan 450000,China
关键词:
唯物史观;  合力;  阶级;  经济因素
Keywords:
materialist historical view;  resultant force;  class;  economic factors
分类号:
A725
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
恩格斯历史合力论借用牛顿经典力学中力的平行四边形定律为理论模型来表达唯物史观的深刻思想,所运用的合力、分力、力的平行四边形及对角线这些自然科学的概念背后都有着深刻的历史观内涵。历史合力的产生需要同时满足两个必不可少的历史条件,即单个人意志的存在和单个人意志之间为争夺有限的物质产品而呈现为冲突的状态。这两个条件同时也限定了恩格斯历史合力论思想的理论效力,在原始社会的蒙昧时期和野蛮时期的低级、中级阶段里,由于单个人意志的不独立,氏族土地公有制的生产关系仍然占主导地位,因而这一理论并不普遍适用。从原始社会野蛮时期的高级阶段直到共产主义实现前的阶级社会,生产资料私有制占主体地位,阶级斗争充当着历史发展的直接动力,恩格斯历史合力论思想是普遍适用的。共产主义社会里单个人意志的冲突状态消失,从而使得恩格斯这一理论并不适用。
Abstract:
The theory of historical resultant force put forward by Engels borrows the parallelogram law in the classical mechanics put forward by Niudun as the theoretical model to express the profound thought of materialist historical view,there are profound historical view connotations behind these natural science concepts:the resultant force,the component force,the parallelogram of force and the diagonal line.The emergence of historical resultant force needs simultaneously to satisfy two essential historical conditions,namely,individual will existence and the state of conflict in order to compete for limited material products between individual wills.These two conditions also limit the theoretical validity of the theory of historical resultant force put forward by Engels,in preliminary and intermediate stage of the period of obscurity and barbarism of the primitive society,the productive relationship of clan land public ownership still dominates due to the non-independence of individual will,accordingly,this theory is not universally applicable.From the high stage in the period of barbarism of the primitive social to the class society before the realization of communism,the private ownership of means of production occupies the main position,the class struggle acts as the direct driving force of historical development,thus the theory of historical resultant force put forward by Engels is universally applicable.In communist society,the state of conflict in order to compete for limited material products between individual wills will be disappeared,thus Engels' theory is not applicable at that time.

参考文献/References:

[1]马克思恩格斯选集(第4卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.
[3]李延明.实体与关系:社会的不同维度—从合力的组成说起[J].马克思主义研究,2007,(10):46.
[4]马克思恩格斯选集(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.
[5]张一兵.恩格斯社会历史观“合力说”之新解[J].现代哲学,1991,(2):51-53.
[6]窦晓东.恩格斯社会历史观“合力说”探析—同张一兵同志商榷[J].现代哲学,1992,(1):41-45.
[7]刘歆立.恩格斯历史合力思想新论[M].郑州:河南人民出版社,2015.
[8]马克思恩格斯全集(第45卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1985.
[9]王南湜.历史合力论新探[J].南开学报,1995,(3):50.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-05-31
基金项目:国家社科基金一般项目“恩格斯历史合力论思想及当代价值研究”(编号:17BZX122); 河南省教育厅人文社会科学一般项目“马克思历史进步论思想及当代价值研究”(编号:2020-ZZJH026)
作者简介:胡招祺(1978-),男,湖北孝感人,哲学博士,河南财经政法大学经济伦理研究中心讲师。研究方向为马克思主义哲学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-20