[1]窦瑜彬,王 炜.《儒林外史》天目山樵评本的特征论析[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,(05):61-66.
　DOU Yubin,WANG Wei.On the Features of Tian Mu Shan Qiao's Comments on The Scholars[J].,2019,(05):61-66.
点击复制

《儒林外史》天目山樵评本的特征论析()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
61-66
栏目:
文学研究
出版日期:
2019-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Features of Tian Mu Shan Qiao's Comments on The Scholars
文章编号:
1000-579(2019)05-0061-06
作者:
窦瑜彬1;  王 炜2
1.武汉大学 传统文化研究中心,湖北 武汉 430072; 2.华中师范大学 文学院,湖北 武汉 430079
Author(s):
DOU Yubin1;  WANG Wei2
1.The Center of Traditional Chinese Cultural Studies,Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430072; 2.College of Chinese and Literature,Central China Normal University,Wuhan,Hubei 430079,China
关键词:
《儒林外史》;  天目山樵;  评点;  特征
Keywords:
The Scholars;  Tian Mu Shan Qiao;  comments;  features
分类号:
207.41
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
天目山樵评点是《儒林外史》评点系统中最晚出现的一家,在辞、意两方面完成了自我创化。天目山樵评点高扬了评点者的主体感受,有效激活并突显了文本原有的讽刺意涵,形成了“评者中心”的批评范式。天目山樵评本在游戏笔墨之中,实则包含着对于小说主旨的深入挖掘。天评本在评点思想和评点方式上都具有严肃性特征,张文虎将“功名富贵说”聚焦于特定的名士群体,并将清代朴学的学术范式纳入评点,推动了《儒林外史》的经典化。天目山樵评点特征的形成,受到评点者个人阅读、读者偏好和历史语境等复杂因素的影响。天目山樵评本促进了小说评点形态的更新、演进,也包含着清末评点家丰赡的批评观念与思想。
Abstract:
Tian Mu Shan Qiao's comments were the latest one of all the comments related to The Scholars,and accomplished its self-creation in terms of words and meanings.Tian Mu Shan Qiao' comments highly praised the reviewer's main feeling,effectively activated and highlighted the original satire of the text,forming the “reviewer center” of the criticism paradigm.His caustic and witty words actually contained his in-depth excavation of the main idea of the novel.Tian Mu Shan Qiao's comments were characterized by his seriousness,while ZHANG Wenhu focused on a specific group of famous people,with the theory of “fame and fortune”,incorporated the academic paradigm,namely the academic thought with examination as the main content of academic study in the Qing Dynasty,into the commentary,and completed an important step of making The Scholarsa Chinese classic.The formation of the features of Tian Mu Shan Qiao's comments was influenced by the reviewer's personal reading,reader preference and historical context.Tian Mu Shan Qiao's comments promoted the renewal and evolution of the novel comment form,and also contained a wide range of critical concepts and ideas of critics in the late Qing Dynasty.

参考文献/References:

[1]张文虎.天目山樵识语[A].朱一玄,刘毓忱编.儒林外史资料汇编[M].天津:南开大学出版社,2012.
[2]李汉秋.儒林外史汇校汇评本[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2010.
[3]张国风.儒林外史试论[M].北京:中华书局,2002.
[4]严维哲,孙 逊.晚清文人小说评点的经典意识——以《儒林外史》张文虎评本为中心[J].天津社会科学,2017,(3):109-115.
[5]姜 胜.论张文虎《儒林外史》评点的朴学倾向[J].滁州学院学报,2010,(3):6-8.
[6]黄安谨.《梦因录》跋[A].张文虎.覆瓿集[M].同治、光绪年间刻本.
[7]闵萃祥.州判衔候选训导张先生行状[A].张文虎.覆瓿集[M].同治、光绪年间刻本.
[8]徐 珂.清稗类钞(第四册)[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
[9]赵建坤.《儒林外史》与茶寮——兼论《儒林外史》的叙事特征[J].名作欣赏,2011,(8):59-61.
[10]陈元之.西游记序[A].朱一玄,刘毓忱编.西游记资料汇编[M].天津:南开大学出版社,2002.
[11]清史列传[M].王钟翰点校.北京:中华书局,1987.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-07-15 基金项目:国家社科基金重大项目“易代之际文学思想研究”(编号:14ZDB073) 作者简介:窦瑜彬(1992-),女,湖北武汉人,武汉大学传统文化研究中心博士研究生。研究方向为明清小说。 王 炜(1973-),女,河南淅川人,华中师范大学文学院教授、博士生导师。研究方向为明清小说。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-10-20