[1]余 彦.驱动视角下消费民事公益诉讼的主体安排及其激励机制[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,(05):107-115.
　YU Yan.A Study of Subject Arrangement and the Incentive Mechanism of Consumption Civil Welfare Litigation From the Perspective of Driving[J].,2018,(05):107-115.
点击复制

驱动视角下消费民事公益诉讼的主体安排及其激励机制()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年05期
页码:
107-115
栏目:
法学探讨
出版日期:
2018-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study of Subject Arrangement and the Incentive Mechanism of Consumption Civil Welfare Litigation From the Perspective of Driving
文章编号:
1000-579(2018)05-0107-09
作者:
余 彦
广东外语外贸大学 广州绿色发展法治研究中心,广东 广州 510420
Author(s):
YU Yan
Guangzhou Green Development Law Research Center,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510420,China
关键词:
消费公益诉讼;  驱动机制;  起诉主体;  序位制度;  激励机制
Keywords:
consumption civil welfare litigation;  driving mechanism;  prosecution subject;  order system;  incentive mechanism
分类号:
DF718
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
消费民事公益诉讼的有效运行有赖于多项制度发挥合力。其中,适格起诉主体制度和起诉主体序位制度共同构成基础驱动机制。我国立法对适格起诉主体范围的规定过于狭窄,为了从源头上保障消费民事公益诉讼动力充足的可能性,应当通过修改立法形成消费者组织、检察机关、个人的三元适格起诉主体格局。起诉主体序位制度是在基于起诉主体存在多元性的前提下,确定最优起诉主体、提高诉讼效率的保障制度。根据“两造结构均衡标准为主,诉讼经济标准为辅”的原则,构建“消费者组织——检察机关——个人”的序位制度是较为合适的做法。激励机制作为辅助驱动机制,是保障起诉主体起诉意愿转化为起诉行为进而积极追求胜诉结果的重要制度。消费民事公益诉讼因至少包含不作为之诉和惩罚性赔偿之诉两种具体类型,激励机制也应当根据两者的特点分别构建。
Abstract:
The effective operation of consumption civil welfare litigatinon depends on several systems to exert the resultant force.Among them,the subject system of appropriate prosecution and the order system of prosecution subject form the basic driving mechanism together.The scope of the subject of appropriate prosecution stipulated by our country's current law is too narrow,in order to guarantee the possibility of sufficient driving force of consumption civil welfare litigation at the source,the structure of the three-dimension appropriate prosecution subject of consumer organization,procuratorial organ and citizen should be formed as soon as possible by amending legislation.The order system of prosecution subject is based on the premise of the prosecution subject polytropism,and it is the guarantee system of determining the best prosecution subject and improving the lawsuit efficiency.According to the principle of “two-structure equilibrium criterion and the supplement of lawsuit economic standard”,it is more appropriate to construct the order system of “consumer organization-procuratorial organ-citizen”.The incentive mechanism is an important system to guarantee the prosecution's willingness of the subject of prosecution to be transformed into a lawsuit and a potential source to enter the litigation procedure.The consumption civil welfare litigation should contain at least the pure civil welfare litigation of the non-action and the punitive civil welfare litigation.The corresponding incentive mechanism should also be based on the different characteristics of the two types of litigation,to construct the dual incentive mechanism.

参考文献/References:

[1]罗书臻.积极稳妥推进消费民事公益诉讼 构建和谐公平诚信消费市场秩序——最高人民法院民一庭负责人就消费民事公益诉讼司法解释答记者问[N].人民法院报,2016-04-26(3).
[2]巩 固.2015年中国环境民事公益诉讼的实证分析[J].法学,2016,(9).
[3]民主与法制网.最高人民检察院总结公益诉讼试点工作成果[EB/OL].http://www.mzyfz.com/cms/jianchashikong/xinwenzhongxin/anjianjujiao/html/1064/2017-07-12/content-1279950.html.
[4]郭松彬,刘显鹏.公益诉讼规则独立化探析——以与民事诉讼规则的界分为基础[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2016,(6).
[5]W.Kip Viscusi.Regulation Through Litigation[M].Washington D.C.:Brookings Institution Press,2002.
[6]吕梦宇.公益诉讼制度现状及对策分析——国家与公众合作,追求高效公益诉讼[J].求实,2006,(11).
[7]谢 军.论消费公益诉讼的起诉主体[J].宁夏社会科学,2015,(5).
[8]杜乐其.消费民事公益诉讼制度的局限及其矫正——《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》第47条之评析[J].理论月刊,2014,(10).
[9]宁立昂.提起公益诉讼的主体本土可行性分析[J].政治与法律,2012,(4).
[10]蔡 巍.美国个人提起公益诉讼的程序和制度保障[J].当代法学,2007,(4).
[11]颜运秋,杨志华.环境公益诉讼两造结构模式研究[J].江西社会科学,2017,(2).
[12]张 锋.环境公益诉讼起诉主体的顺位设计刍议[J].法学论坛,2017,(2).
[13]陈 亮.环境公益诉讼激励机制的法律构造——以传统民事诉讼与环境公益诉讼的当事人结构差异为视角[J].现代法学,2016,(4).
[14]Neal H.Klausner.The Dynamics of Rule 11:Preventing Frivolous Litigation by Demanding Professional Responsibility[J].New York University Law Review,1986,(61).
[15]李友根.论消费者协会公益诉讼的损害赔偿请求权——对最高人民法院司法解释立场的商榷[J].政治与法律,2017,(9).
[16]刘 璐.消费公益诉讼的法律构造[J].法学,2013,(7).
[17]黄忠顺.食品安全私人执法研究——以惩罚性赔偿型消费公益诉讼为中心[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,(4).
[18]宋亚辉.食品消费公益诉讼的功能定位与功效评估[J].浙江学刊,2017,(3).
[19]王政勇.消费公益诉讼的司法理念及特殊审判规则的构建[J].法律适用,2014,(11).

相似文献/References:

[1]何建民,陈志军.乡村旅游聚落用地与空间结构模式演变研究——以婺源篁岭为例[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,(03):58.
　HE Jianmin,CHEN Zhijun.The Evolution of Land Use and Spatial Structure Pattern of Rural Tourism Settlements—A Case Study of Huangling in Wuyuan County[J].,2023,(05):58.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-07-20
作者简介:余 彦(1987-),男,江西南昌人,法学博士,广东外语外贸大学广州绿色发展法治研究中心研究人员。研究方向为经济法学、环境法学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-10-20