[1]周良慧.论我国立案登记制度适用中的恶意诉讼防治机制[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,(04):44-48.
　ZHOU Lianghui.On Prevention Mechanism Against the Malicious Litigation in the Application of Case Filing Registration System in China[J].,2015,(04):44-48.
点击复制

论我国立案登记制度适用中的恶意诉讼防治机制()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2015年04期
页码:
44-48
栏目:
出版日期:
2015-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
On Prevention Mechanism Against the Malicious Litigation in the Application of Case Filing Registration System in China
作者:
周良慧;
北京航天航空大学 法学院,北京,100191
Author(s):
ZHOU Lianghui
关键词:
立案登记制度; 恶意诉讼行为; 立案信息泄露; 防治机制
Keywords:
case filing registration system; malicious litigation; case information disclosure; preven-tion mechanism
分类号:
D915.18
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
立案登记制度既为民众开辟了更为有效的通过诉讼寻求纠纷解决的道路,同时也为恶意诉讼打开了方便之门。恶意诉讼防治首先应当知悉恶意诉讼的多样性特征,协调立案登记制度在应对恶意串通的虚假诉讼和妨碍逃避执行中的作用,为司法改革寻找适合的协调适用方式。警惕立案登记制度适用时可能存在的案件信息泄露风险,并就可能出现的信息泄露主体予以明确,通过对相关法律规定的探索寻求责任承担方式。
Abstract:
To protect litigants’right of action and make civil litigation more convenient and more in-timacy to all the parties,the case filing registration system has been put into effect. The coming of ac-creditation by registration not only blazes a more efficient trail for the masses to settle dispute through litigation,but opens up a convenient door to malicious civil litigation as well. For the relationship be-tween the prevention of malicious civil litigation and the accreditation by registration,we should first know diverse characteristics of malicious civil litigation and the function of registration system in dealing with malicious collusive false litigation and escaping execution,so as to seek a coordinated applicable method for judicial reform. We should also keep a wary eye on potential risk of case infor-mation disclosure when applying the case filing registration system,clear about the potential subjects of information disclosure,and look for a way to take responsibilities by exploring relevant legal provi-sions.

参考文献/References:

[1]肖建华.论恶意诉讼及其法律规制[J].中国人民大学学报,2012,(4).
[2]孟 涛,潘水良.论标罗诉讼要件理论的创立[J].政治与法律,2008,(5).
[3]崔 峰.敞开司法之门——民事起诉制度研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005.
[4]〔日〕中村英郎.新民事诉讼法讲义[M].陈 刚,等译.北京:法律出版社,2001.
[5]白绿铉,卞建林译.美国联邦民事诉讼规则证据规则[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2000.
[6]徐昕译.英国民事诉讼规则[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2001.
[7]宋旺兴.论民事诉讼立案审查制度[J].西南政法大学学报,2008,(4).
[8]王福华.民事起诉制度改革研究[J].法制与社会发展,2001,(6).
[9]张卫平.起诉条件与实体判决要件[J].法学研究,2004,(6).
[10]解决“立案难”要立足中国国情[J].中国审判,2007,(1).
[11]宋四辈.王锦.中国古代非必要诉讼研究:厌讼观反思[J].湘潭大学学报,2010,(6).
[12]高 中,杨哲媛.和谐社会视野下“好诉”与“厌诉”冲突之反思——一种比较、实证的维度[J].求索,2008,(1).
[13]钱 穆.论语新解[M].北京:九州出版社,2011.
[14]李 浩.虚假诉讼中恶意调解问题研究[J].江海学刊.2012,(1).
[15]宋 强.劳动争议中劳动者的恶意诉讼及防范[J].中国人力资源开发,2013,(7).
[16]Leon I.Alexander.“Wrongful Attachment DamagesMust Be Fixed in theOriginal Suit”,4 U.S.F.L.Rev.38(October 1969):1969-1970.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
2013年度国家社会科学基金项目“案外人权利救济的民事诉讼制度研究”(编号:13BFX077)
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01