[1]王祥辰,许建中.《渔洋山人精华录训纂》的朴学范式及其诗学启示[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,(02):82-89.
　WANG Xiangchen,XU Jianzhong.The Plain Learning Paradigm and Its Poetics Inspiration of Excerpts of Yu Yang Shan Ren's Essence Training[J].,2020,(02):82-89.
点击复制

《渔洋山人精华录训纂》的朴学范式及其诗学启示()
分享到：

《江西师范大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
82-89
栏目:
文学研究
出版日期:
2020-04-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Plain Learning Paradigm and Its Poetics Inspiration of Excerpts of Yu Yang Shan Ren's Essence Training
文章编号:
1000-579(2020)02-0082-08
作者:
王祥辰;  许建中
扬州大学 文学院,江苏 扬州 225009
Author(s):
WANG Xiangchen;  XU Jianzhong
College of Humanities,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou,Jiangshu 225009,China
关键词:
惠栋;  《渔洋山人精华录训纂》;  文学艺术;  实证
Keywords:
HUI Dong;  Excerpts of Yu Yang Shan Ren's Essence Training;  literature and art;  demonstration
分类号:
I206.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
惠栋训纂王士禛《渔洋山人精华录》,引起了清代诗坛及学术界的广泛议论。其中钱大昕、江藩有关《训纂》的评价尤具代表性,钱、江二人均认为《训纂》的成就已超过任渊《山谷诗集注》、李壁《王荆文公诗笺注》。惠栋《训纂》在与任渊《集注》、李壁《笺注》对比后,彰显出“忠于原本”“以证代议”及“博采兼容”等特点,然仍无法佐证该书成就超轶《集注》《笺注》。钱大昕、江藩有关《训纂》的评点,折射出清代诗歌注释学注重艺术境界与强调朴学实证、“求精”与“嗜博”,两套不同评价体系间的对立。而朴学视域下艺术审美与学术价值的冲突,也影响了此后诗歌注释学的发展路径。
Abstract:
Excerpts of Yu Yang Shan Ren's Essence Training fabricated by WANG Shizhen and annotated by HUI Dong arouses the extensive discussion of poetry and academia of the Qing Dynasty.QIAN Daxin and JIANG Fan's comment on Excerpts of Yu Yang Shan Ren's Essence Training was representative.QIAN and JIANG thought that the achievement of Excerpts of Yu Yang Shan Ren's Essence Training had exceeded Shan Gu Shi Ji Zhu of REN Yuan and Wang Jing Wen Gong Shi Jian Zhu of LI Bi.Compared with Shan Gu Shi Ji Zhu of REN Yuan and Wang Jing Wen Gong Shi Jian Zhu of LI Bi,Excerpts of Yu Yang Shan Ren's Essence Training by HUI Dong showed the features of “being loyal to the original text”,“replacing argumentation with demonstration” and “being inclusive and compatible”,but there were no proof which could prove that the book exceeds Shan Gu Shi Ji Zhu and Wang Jing Wen Gong Shi Jian Zhu.QIAN Daxin and JIANG Fan's comment on Excerpts of Yu Yang Shan Ren's Essence Training reflected the contrast of two different evaluation systems in poetry annotation in the Qing Dynasty,paying attention to the artistic realm and emphasizing the demonstration of textual research,“refining” and “erudite”.The conflict of art aesthetics and academic values under the vision of textual research also affected the development patch of poetry annotation in the later period.

参考文献/References:

[1]钱大昕.潜研堂文集[M].嘉定钱大昕全集(第9册)[Z].南京:凤凰出版社,2016.
[2]江 藩.汉学师承记(外二种)[M].上海:中西书局,2012.
[3]永 瑢,等.四库全书总目[M].北京:中华书局,2016.
[4]许 尹.序[A].山谷诗集注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2003.
[5]张承凤.论任渊及其《山谷诗集注》[J].文学遗产,2005,(4):63-71.
[6]惠 栋.渔洋山人精华录训纂[M].四部备要(第85册)[Z].上海:中华书局,1920-1931.
[7]方 回.瀛奎律髓汇评[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1986.
[8]任 渊,等.山谷诗集注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2003.
[9]徐 康.跋[A].朱淑真集注[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
[10]李 壁.王荆文公诗笺注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2010.
[11]王友胜.论《王荆公诗笺注》的学术价值与局限[J].中国文学研究,2008,(2):53-57.
[12]法式善.槐厅载笔[M].续修四库全书(第1178册)[Z].上海:上海古籍出版社,1995-2002.
[13]王 昶.春融堂文集[M].续修四库全书(第1438册)[Z].上海:上海古籍出版社,1995-2002.
[14]梁章钜.退庵随笔[M].续修四库全书(第1197册)[Z].上海:上海古籍出版社,1995-2002.
[15]惠 栋.松崖文钞[A].东吴三惠诗文集[M].漆永祥校点.台北:“中研院”中国文哲研究所,2006.
[16]龚自珍.龚自珍全集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1959.
[17]刘声木.苌楚斋随笔[M].北京:中华书局,1998.
[18]宫晓卫,等.渔洋精华录集注[M].济南:齐鲁书社,2009.
[19]卢元昌.杜诗阐[O].清康熙间听玉堂刻本.
[20]温庆新.传统目录学与来裕恂《中国文学史稿》之编纂[J].中国文学研究,2008,(2):93-98.
[21]蒋 寅.《杜诗详注》与古典诗歌注释学之得失[J].杜甫研究学刊,1995,(2):43-50.
[22]王祥辰.“根柢”重构、“诗史”追寻与家学接续——论惠栋的诗学旨趣[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,(1):153-160.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-03-21
基金项目:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“清代扬州学派文献整理与研究”(编号:14JZD035); 扬州大学研究生科研创新项目“惠栋与吴派经学研究”
作者简介:王祥辰(1990-),男,江苏南京人,扬州大学博士研究生。研究方向为清代学术与文学。
许建中(1957-),男,山东海阳人,扬州大学教授、博士生导师。研究方向为中国戏曲史和中国小说史。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-20